Literature DB >> 22037888

Provider and pharmacist responses to warfarin drug-drug interaction alerts: a study of healthcare downstream of CPOE alerts.

Allison M Miller1, Maureen S Boro, Nancy E Korman, J Ben Davoren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To categorize the appropriateness of provider and pharmacist responses to warfarin critical drug-drug interaction (cDDI) alerts, assess responses and actions to the cDDI, and determine the occurrence of warfarin adverse drug events (ADE) after alerts.
DESIGN: An 18-month, retrospective study of acute care admissions at a single Veterans Affairs medical center using computerized provider order entry (CPOE). MEASUREMENTS: Patients included had at least one warfarin cDDI alert. Chart reviews included baseline laboratory values and demographics, provider actions, patient outcomes, and associated factors, including other interacting medications and number of simultaneously processed alerts.
RESULTS: 137 admissions were included (133 unique patients). Amiodarone, vitamin E in a multivitamin, sulfamethoxazole, and levothyroxine accounted for 75% of warfarin cDDI. Provider responses were clinically appropriate in 19.7% of admissions and pharmacist responses were appropriate in 9.5% of admissions. There were 50 ADE (36.6% of admissions) with warfarin; 80% were rated as having no or mild clinical effect. An increased number of non-critical alerts at the time of the reference cDDI alert was the only variable associated with an inappropriate provider response (p=0.01). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by being a retrospective review and the possibility of confounding variables, such as other interacting medications.
CONCLUSION: The large number of CPOE alerts may lead to inappropriate responses by providers and pharmacists. The high rate of ADE suggests a need for improved medication management systems for patients on warfarin. This study highlights the possibility of alert fatigue contributing to the high prevalence of inappropriate alert over-ride text responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037888      PMCID: PMC3241165          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  26 in total

Review 1.  Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rainu Kaushal; Kaveh G Shojania; David W Bates
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-23

2.  Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.

Authors:  Heleen van der Sijs; Jos Aarts; Arnold Vulto; Marc Berg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Improving override rates for computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care.

Authors:  Nidhi R Shah; Andrew C Seger; Diane L Seger; Julie M Fiskio; Gilad J Kuperman; Barry Blumenfeld; Elaine G Recklet; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Prescribers' responses to alerts during medication ordering in the long term care setting.

Authors:  James Judge; Terry S Field; Martin DeFlorio; Jane Laprino; Jill Auger; Paula Rochon; David W Bates; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Reducing warfarin medication interactions: an interrupted time series evaluation.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; David H Smith; Nancy Perrin; Xiuhai Yang; Steven R Simon; Michael Krall; Dean F Sittig; Diane Ditmer; Richard Platt; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-08

6.  Approach for analysis of order check overrides in a computerized practitioner order entry system.

Authors:  Ching-Ping Lin; W Paul Nichol; Patty Hoey; Terry L Roth; Curtis Anderson; John H Gennari; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

7.  The use of tissue-type plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: results from thrombolysis in myocardial infarction Phase I, open label studies and the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II pilot study. The TIMI Investigators.

Authors:  B R Chaitman; B Thompson; M D Wittry; D Stump; W P Hamilton; L D Hillis; J G Dwyer; R E Solomon; G L Knatterud
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Administrative claims analysis of the relationship between warfarin use and risk of hemorrhage including drug-drug and drug-disease interactions.

Authors:  Kui Zhang; Christopher Young; Jan Berger
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2006-10

9.  Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Maria Toth; Daniel Z Sands; Mark D Aronson; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-24

10.  Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system.

Authors:  Tyken C Hsieh; Gilad J Kuperman; Tonushree Jaggi; Patricia Hojnowski-Diaz; Julie Fiskio; Deborah H Williams; David W Bates; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  19 in total

1.  The role of informatics in health care reform.

Authors:  Yueyi I Liu; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  When One Size Doesn't Fit All.

Authors:  Karl A Matuszewski
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-02

3.  Drug Interactions in Space: a Cause for Concern?

Authors:  Erez Berman; Sara Eyal
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Generating Evidence of Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Katsiaryna Bykov; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  An evaluation of the completeness of drug-drug interaction-related information in package inserts.

Authors:  Giok Qin Ng; Grant Edward Sklar; Hui Ting Chng
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Applying human factors principles to alert design increases efficiency and reduces prescribing errors in a scenario-based simulation.

Authors:  Alissa L Russ; Alan J Zillich; Brittany L Melton; Scott A Russell; Siying Chen; Jeffrey R Spina; Michael Weiner; Elizabette G Johnson; Joanne K Daggy; M Sue McManus; Jason M Hawsey; Anthony G Puleo; Bradley N Doebbeling; Jason J Saleem
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Laboratory monitoring for pharmaceuticals: familiarity does not breed contempt.

Authors:  Cynthia A Jackevicius; Peter Glassman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Journal club: Requiring clinical justification to override repeat imaging decision support: impact on CT use.

Authors:  Stacy D O'Connor; Aaron D Sodickson; Ivan K Ip; Ali S Raja; Michael J Healey; Louise I Schneider; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Consensus recommendations for systematic evaluation of drug-drug interaction evidence for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Richard T Scheife; Lisa E Hines; Richard D Boyce; Sophie P Chung; Jeremiah D Momper; Christine D Sommer; Darrell R Abernethy; John R Horn; Stephen J Sklar; Samantha K Wong; Gretchen Jones; Mary L Brown; Amy J Grizzle; Susan Comes; Tricia Lee Wilkins; Clarissa Borst; Michael A Wittie; Daniel C Malone
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Eliminating Health Care Disparities With Mandatory Clinical Decision Support: The Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Example.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Adil H Haider; Michael B Streiff; Christoph U Lehmann; Peggy S Kraus; Deborah B Hobson; Franca S Kraenzlin; Amer M Zeidan; Peter J Pronovost; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.