Literature DB >> 22037886

Distribution and health-risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils at a coking plant.

Wanhui Zhang1, Chaohai Wei, Chunhua Feng, Zhe Yu, Man Ren, Bo Yan, Pingan Peng, Jiamo Fu.   

Abstract

Nineteen soil samples were collected in and around Songshan coking plant in Guangdong province of China and analyzed for eighteen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The total concentration of PAHs ranged from 2.36 to 1146.39 mg kg(-1) dry weight, varying significantly among the sampling sites, most individual PAHs were correlated with each other. A cluster analysis was performed to examine the correlation of PAH distribution, five groups were observed with sample types in the coking plant. 2-3 ring PAHs were predominant in group I and II, while 4-5 ring PAHs showed great abundance in group III, IV and V, which contributed to the distance from the emission sources in the coking plant and the behaviors of particle-bound and gaseous PAHs. The ratios of Flu : (Flu + Pyr), BaA : (BaA + Chr), InP : (InP + BgP) and Ant : (Ant + Phen) ratios were 0.51-0.87, 0.16-0.89, 0.47-0.68 and 0.03-0.60, respectively. The total index of all studied soils was > 6, indicating that the source of the PAHs in coking plant soils were from the pyrolysis processes. Health risk assessments were carried out by dermal PAH exposure data to quantify cancer risk. The resultant lifetime exposure levels due to TEQ(BaP) desorbed onto skin for workers ranged from 2.25 × 10(-7) to 7.86 × 10(-5) mg kg(-1) per day, and the estimated cancer risks were between 8.45 × 10(-6) and 2.94 × 10(-3), indicating that the dermal exposures of PAHs to coking workers might be acceptable in most soil sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037886     DOI: 10.1039/c1em10671f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  6 in total

1.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons loads and potential risks in freshwater ecosystem of the Ikpa River Basin, Niger Delta-Nigeria.

Authors:  Edu Inam; Nnanake-Abasi Offiong; Joseph Essien; Suil Kang; Seo-Young Kang; Bassey Antia
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban green spaces of Beijing: concentration, spatial distribution and risk assessment.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Jianzhi Wu; Yan Liu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Source of biomass cooking fuel determines pulmonary response to household air pollution.

Authors:  Thomas E Sussan; Vijendra Ingole; Jung-Hyun Kim; Sarah McCormick; Jesse Negherbon; Jonathan Fallica; Jason Akulian; Lonny Yarmus; David Feller-Kopman; Marsha Wills-Karp; Maureen R Horton; Patrick N Breysse; Anurag Agrawal; Sanjay Juvekar; Sundeep Salvi; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.914

4.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in farmland soils around main reservoirs of Jilin Province, China: occurrence, sources and potential human health risk.

Authors:  Yanan Chen; Jiquan Zhang; Feng Zhang; Fengxu Li; Mo Zhou
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Firefighter occupation is associated with increased risk for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma among men from the Greater Boston area.

Authors:  Scott M Langevin; Melissa Eliot; Rondi A Butler; Michael McClean; Karl T Kelsey
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Coking wastewater treatment plant as a sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sediments and ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Jundong Chen; Jianbo Liao; Chaohai Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.