Literature DB >> 22037701

Skin conductance for monitoring of acute pain in adult postoperative patients: influence of electrode surface area and sampling time.

Thomas Ledowski1, Sebastian Albus, Jessica Stein, Bradley Macdonald.   

Abstract

Aim of this prospective randomized study was to determine the influence of the electrode surface area and sampling time on the accuracy of the number of fluctuations in skin conductance per second to distinguish different states of acute pain. These methodological issues have been previously suggested as an explanation for contradictory data related to the accuracy of the skin conductance monitor. A total of 541 pain ratings on a numeric rating scale (0-10) were obtained from 120 adult postoperative patients. The number of fluctuations in skin conductance per second was recorded using two different electrode types (surface area 254 vs. 474 mm(2)) and sampling times (7.5 vs. 30 s). A longer sampling time did result in higher values for the number of fluctuations in skin conductance per second, though without improving its accuracy to distinguish different states of pain. However, the latter was found improved when the smaller surface area electrodes were used. A combination of small surface area electrodes and a 30 s sampling time resulted in the highest area under the curve in the receiver operating curve analysis of the method to identify states of moderate to severe pain (numeric rating scale > 3): 0.68 vs. e.g. 0.55 [data from all patients combined]). We conclude that the type of electrodes used but only to a lesser degree the sampling time influence the accuracy of the number of fluctuations in skin conductance per second to identify states of moderate or severe postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22037701     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-011-9314-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  9 in total

1.  Palmar skin conductance compared to a developed stress score and to noxious and awakening stimuli on patients in anaesthesia.

Authors:  H Storm; M Shafiei; K Myre; J Raeder
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Skin conductance as a measure of pain and stress in hospitalised infants.

Authors:  Denise Harrison; Suzanne Boyce; Peter Loughnan; Peter Dargaville; Hanne Storm; Linda Johnston
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Monitoring of sympathetic tone to assess postoperative pain: skin conductance vs surgical stress index.

Authors:  T Ledowski; B Ang; T Schmarbeck; J Rhodes
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  What should the researchers do when they are not able to reproduce their own findings?

Authors:  H Storm
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  The assessment of postoperative pain by monitoring skin conductance: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  T Ledowski; J Bromilow; J Wu; M J Paech; H Storm; S A Schug
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Skin conductance fluctuations correlate poorly with postoperative self-report pain measures in school-aged children.

Authors:  Eugene K Choo; William Magruder; Carolyne J Montgomery; Joanne Lim; Rollin Brant; J Mark Ansermino
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Monitoring of skin conductance to assess postoperative pain intensity.

Authors:  T Ledowski; J Bromilow; M J Paech; H Storm; R Hacking; S A Schug
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The effects of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate on skin conductance as a measure of pain.

Authors:  Thomas Ledowski; James Preuss; Stephan A Schug
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Monitoring electrical skin conductance: a tool for the assessment of postoperative pain in children?

Authors:  Bruce Hullett; Neil Chambers; James Preuss; Italo Zamudio; Jonas Lange; Elaine Pascoe; Thomas Ledowski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.892

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Variations of the analgesia nociception index during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

Authors:  M Jeanne; C Clément; J De Jonckheere; R Logier; B Tavernier
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Assessment of postoperative pain intensity by using photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Peng Ling; Yu Siyuan; Wei Wei; Gong Quan; Gao Bo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  A physiological assessment of patient pain during surgery with wide-awake local anesthesia.

Authors:  A Luke MacNeill; D Joshua Mayich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-28

Review 4.  Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Su Min
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Normalized skin conductance level could differentiate physical pain stimuli from other sympathetic stimuli.

Authors:  Satomi Sugimine; Shigeru Saito; Tomonori Takazawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Music Listening Among Postoperative Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Nancy Ames; Rebecca Shuford; Li Yang; Brad Moriyama; Meredith Frey; Florencia Wilson; Thiruppavai Sundaramurthi; Danelle Gori; Andrew Mannes; Alexandra Ranucci; Deloris Koziol; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  Integr Med Insights       Date:  2017-07-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.