OBJECTIVE: Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is characterized by selective inflammation of the spinal cord and optic nerves but is distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS). Interferon (IFN)-β mitigates disease activity in MS, but is controversial in NMO, with a few reports of disease worsening after IFN-β therapy in this highly active disease. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), IFNs adversely affect disease activity. This study examines for the first time whether serum IFN-α/β activity and IFN-β-induced responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) are abnormally elevated in NMO, as they are in SLE, but contrast to low levels in MS. METHODS: Serum type I IFN-α/β activity was measured by a previously validated bioassay of 3 IFN-stimulated genes (RT-PCR sensitivity, 0.1 U/ml) rather than ELISA, which has lower sensitivity and specificity for measuring serum IFNs. IFN responses in PBMNC were assessed by in vitro IFN-β-induced activation of phospho-tyrosine-STAT1 and phospho-serine-STAT1 transcription factors, and MxA proteins using Western blots. RESULTS: Serum IFN-α/β activity was highest in SLE patients, followed by healthy subjects and NMO, but was surprisingly low in therapy-naïve MS. In functional assays in vitro, IFN-β-induced high levels of P-S-STAT1 in NMO and SLE, but not in MS and controls. IFN-β-induced MxA protein levels were elevated in NMO and SLE compared to MS. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IFN activity and IFN-β-induced responses in PBMNC are elevated in SLE and NMO patients versus MS. This argues for similarities in pathophysiology between NMO and SLE and provides an explanation for IFN-induced disease worsening in NMO.
OBJECTIVE:Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is characterized by selective inflammation of the spinal cord and optic nerves but is distinct from multiple sclerosis (MS). Interferon (IFN)-β mitigates disease activity in MS, but is controversial in NMO, with a few reports of disease worsening after IFN-β therapy in this highly active disease. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), IFNs adversely affect disease activity. This study examines for the first time whether serum IFN-α/β activity and IFN-β-induced responses in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) are abnormally elevated in NMO, as they are in SLE, but contrast to low levels in MS. METHODS: Serum type I IFN-α/β activity was measured by a previously validated bioassay of 3 IFN-stimulated genes (RT-PCR sensitivity, 0.1 U/ml) rather than ELISA, which has lower sensitivity and specificity for measuring serum IFNs. IFN responses in PBMNC were assessed by in vitro IFN-β-induced activation of phospho-tyrosine-STAT1 and phospho-serine-STAT1 transcription factors, and MxA proteins using Western blots. RESULTS: Serum IFN-α/β activity was highest in SLEpatients, followed by healthy subjects and NMO, but was surprisingly low in therapy-naïve MS. In functional assays in vitro, IFN-β-induced high levels of P-S-STAT1 in NMO and SLE, but not in MS and controls. IFN-β-induced MxA protein levels were elevated in NMO and SLE compared to MS. CONCLUSIONS: Serum IFN activity and IFN-β-induced responses in PBMNC are elevated in SLE and NMO patients versus MS. This argues for similarities in pathophysiology between NMO and SLE and provides an explanation for IFN-induced disease worsening in NMO.
Authors: Ken D Yamaguchi; Daniel L Ruderman; Ed Croze; T Charis Wagner; Sharlene Velichko; Anthony T Reder; Hugh Salamon Journal: J Neuroimmunol Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: A Javed; R Balabanov; B G W Arnason; T J Kelly; N J Sweiss; P Pytel; R Walsh; E A Blair; A Stemer; M Lazzaro; A T Reder Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Anthony T Reder; Sharlene Velichko; Ken D Yamaguchi; Kemal Hamamcioglu; Karin Ku; Johanna Beekman; T Charis Wagner; H Daniel Perez; Hugh Salamon; Ed Croze Journal: J Interferon Cytokine Res Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.607
Authors: Sean J Pittock; Vanda A Lennon; Jerome de Seze; Patrick Vermersch; Henry A Homburger; Dean M Wingerchuk; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Hélène Zéphir; Kevin Moder; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-01
Authors: E S Emamian; J M Leon; C J Lessard; M Grandits; E C Baechler; P M Gaffney; B Segal; N L Rhodus; K L Moser Journal: Genes Immun Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 2.676
Authors: Mark A Jensen; Karen C Patterson; Akaash A Kumar; Marissa Kumabe; Beverly S Franek; Timothy B Niewold Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Ryan D Schubert; Yang Hu; Gaurav Kumar; Spencer Szeto; Peter Abraham; Johannes Winderl; Joel M Guthridge; Gabriel Pardo; Jeffrey Dunn; Lawrence Steinman; Robert C Axtell Journal: J Immunol Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 5.422