Literature DB >> 22036146

Allograft cellular bone matrix as an alternative to autograft in hindfoot and ankle fusion procedures.

Shane M Hollawell1.   

Abstract

This report summarizes the radiographic results of Osteocel Plus in 20 hindfoot and ankle fusions at a single center. The patient population was 40% female with an average age of 57.9 ± 16.1 years. Average body mass index was 33.8 ± 9.1. Risk factors included 3 smokers and 6 patients with diabetes. Primary surgical indications included trauma (50%), Charcot arthropathy (15%), foot drop with osteoarthritis (20%), primary osteoarthritis (10%), and total talar extrusion (5%). Nine patients had a history of prior hindfoot surgery in the same foot; however, only 2 of the cases reported in this series were revisions due to a failed prior surgery; the remaining 7 were treated for correction of a traumatic deformity (n = 5) or diagnosis at a new site in the same foot (n = 2). Treatment included subtalar joint arthrodesis (50%), ankle arthrodesis (40%), triple fusion (5%), and tibial-calcaneal-calcaneal-cuboid arthrodesis (5%). Solid fusion was observed in 100% of patients by the 6-month evaluation. Average time to fusion was 13.5 weeks. Although patients with a prior surgery trended toward a longer time to fusion than patients who underwent their first hindfoot and ankle procedure (14.4 ± 5.3 vs. 12.6 ± 5.7 weeks), the difference was not statistically significant (p = .47). There was no evidence of graft rejection or failure. This series demonstrates that mesenchymal stem cell-based bone allograft is a safe and effective bone-healing material with a high radiographic success rate in foot and ankle arthrodeses with successful and timely fusion rates.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036146     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bone repair with skeletal stem cells: rationale, progress to date and clinical application.

Authors:  Elena A Jones; Peter V Giannoudis; Dimitrios Kouroupis
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Multipotential stromal cell abundance in cellular bone allograft: comparison with fresh age-matched iliac crest bone and bone marrow aspirate.

Authors:  Thomas G Baboolal; Sally A Boxall; Yasser M El-Sherbiny; Timothy A Moseley; Richard J Cuthbert; Peter V Giannoudis; Dennis McGonagle; Elena Jones
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Acellular mineralized allogenic block bone graft does not remodel during the 10 weeks following concurrent implant placement in a rabbit femoral model.

Authors:  D Joshua Cohen; Kayla M Scott; Aniket N Kulkarni; Jennifer S Wayne; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Lineage mapping and characterization of the native progenitor population in cellular allograft.

Authors:  Mike Chen; Rahul Jandial; Josh Neman; Vincent Duenas; Claudia Kowolik; Amanda Hambrecht
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 6.  Ordinary and Activated Bone Grafts: Applied Classification and the Main Features.

Authors:  R V Deev; A Y Drobyshev; I Y Bozo; A A Isaev
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.