Literature DB >> 22036127

Impact of preoperative anterior leaflet tethering on the recurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation and the lack of left ventricular reverse remodeling after restrictive annuloplasty.

Sandro Gelsomino1, Leen van Garsse, Fabiana Lucà, Roberto Lorusso, Emile Cheriex, Carmelo Massimiliano Rao, Sabina Caciolli, Enrico Vizzardi, Elena Crudeli, Pierluigi Stefàno, Gian Franco Gensini, Jos Maessen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate the impact of the preoperative anterior mitral leaflet tethering angle, α', on the recurrence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR) after undersized mitral ring annuloplasty.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 362 patients, who were divided into two groups by baseline α': group 1, α' < 39.5° (n = 196), and group 2, α' ≥ 39.5° (n = 166). End points were recurrent MR ≥ 2+; LVRR, defined as a reduction in end-systolic volume index > 15%; and LV geometric reverse remodeling, defined as a reduction in systolic sphericity index to a normal value of <0.72 in patients with altered baseline geometry.
RESULTS: MR occurred in 9.6% (n = 19) and 43.3% (n = 72) of the patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < .001). LVRR (85.7% vs 22.2%) at follow-up was higher in group 1 (P < .001). On multivariate regression analysis, α' ≥ 39.5° was a strong predictor of MR recurrence, lack of LV reverse remodeling and lack of LV geometric reverse remodeling (all P values < .001). In contrast, the posterior mitral leaflet tethering angle, β', was not significant (all P values > .05). When we allowed for interactions between α' and other risk factors, this effect occurred also in low-risk subgroups, and it was equivalent or generally attenuated in higher risk patients. There were no significant interactions between α' and any of the covariates (all P values > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior mitral leaflet tethering is a powerful predictor of MR recurrence and lack of LVRR after undersized mitral ring annuloplasty. Evaluation of leaflet tethering should be incorporated into clinical risk assessment and prediction models.
Copyright © 2011 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036127     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ischemic mitral regurgitation: not only a bystander.

Authors:  Philippe Unger; Julien Magne; Chantal Dedobbeleer; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Topographic mapping of left ventricular regional contractile injury in ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Timothy S Lancaster; Julia Kar; Brian P Cupps; Matthew C Henn; Kevin Kulshrestha; Danielle J Koerner; Michael K Pasque
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  The value of preoperative 3-dimensional over 2-dimensional valve analysis in predicting recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after mitral annuloplasty.

Authors:  Inez J Wijdh-den Hamer; Wobbe Bouma; Eric K Lai; Melissa M Levack; Eric K Shang; Alison M Pouch; Thomas J Eperjesi; Theodore J Plappert; Paul A Yushkevich; Judy Hung; Massimo A Mariani; Kamal R Khabbaz; Thomas G Gleason; Feroze Mahmood; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo; Albert T Cheung; Matthew J Gillespie; Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Predicting recurrent mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Irving L Kron; Judy Hung; Jessica R Overbey; Denis Bouchard; Annetine C Gelijns; Alan J Moskowitz; Pierre Voisine; Patrick T O'Gara; Michael Argenziano; Robert E Michler; Marc Gillinov; John D Puskas; James S Gammie; Michael J Mack; Peter K Smith; Chittoor Sai-Sudhakar; Timothy J Gardner; Gorav Ailawadi; Xin Zeng; Karen O'Sullivan; Michael K Parides; Roger Swayze; Vinod Thourani; Eric A Rose; Louis P Perrault; Michael A Acker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation: outcomes of flexible versus semi-rigid rings.

Authors:  Philip Y K Pang; Ming Jie Huang; Teing Ee Tan; See Lim Lim; Madhava J Naik; Victor T T Chao; Yoong Kong Sin; Chong Hee Lim; Yeow Leng Chua
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Assessment of mitral valve complex by three-dimensional echocardiography: therapeutic strategy for functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Yoshida; Kikuko Obase
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-25

7.  Echocardiographic assessment of ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  David M Dudzinski; Judy Hung
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

8.  Mitral valve annuloplasty versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Baotong Li; Shanglin Chen; Hansong Sun; Jianping Xu; Yunhu Song; Wei Wang; Shuiyun Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pathological Remodeling of Mitral Valve Leaflets from Unphysiologic Leaflet Mechanics after Undersized Mitral Annuloplasty to Repair Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation.

Authors:  Alicja Sielicka; Eric L Sarin; Weiwei Shi; Fatiesa Sulejmani; Daniella Corporan; Kanika Kalra; Vinod H Thourani; Wei Sun; Robert A Guyton; Muralidhar Padala
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Echocardiographic assessment of functional mitral regurgitation: opening Pandora's box?

Authors:  Andreas Hagendorff; Torsten Doenst; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2019-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.