Literature DB >> 22036083

Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication.

Yousuke Kaifu1, Hisao Baba, Thomas Sutikna, Michael J Morwood, Daisuke Kubo, E Wahyu Saptomo, Rokhus Due Awe, Tony Djubiantono.   

Abstract

This paper describes in detail the external morphology of LB1/1, the nearly complete and only known cranium of Homo floresiensis. Comparisons were made with a large sample of early groups of the genus Homo to assess primitive, derived, and unique craniofacial traits of LB1 and discuss its evolution. Principal cranial shape differences between H. floresiensis and Homo sapiens are also explored metrically. The LB1 specimen exhibits a marked reductive trend in its facial skeleton, which is comparable to the H. sapiens condition and is probably associated with reduced masticatory stresses. However, LB1 is craniometrically different from H. sapiens showing an extremely small overall cranial size, and the combination of a primitive low and anteriorly narrow vault shape, a relatively prognathic face, a rounded oval foramen that is greatly separated anteriorly from the carotid canal/jugular foramen, and a unique, tall orbital shape. Whereas the neurocranium of LB1 is as small as that of some Homo habilis specimens, it exhibits laterally expanded parietals, a weak suprameatal crest, a moderately flexed occipital, a marked facial reduction, and many other derived features that characterize post-habilis Homo. Other craniofacial characteristics of LB1 include, for example, a relatively narrow frontal squama with flattened right and left sides, a marked frontal keel, posteriorly divergent temporal lines, a posteriorly flexed anteromedial corner of the mandibular fossa, a bulbous lateral end of the supraorbital torus, and a forward protruding maxillary body with a distinct infraorbital sulcus. LB1 is most similar to early Javanese Homo erectus from Sangiran and Trinil in these and other aspects. We conclude that the craniofacial morphology of LB1 is consistent with the hypothesis that H. floresiensis evolved from early Javanese H. erectus with dramatic island dwarfism. However, further field discoveries of early hominin skeletal remains from Flores and detailed analyses of the finds are needed to understand the evolutionary history of this endemic hominin species. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22036083     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  15 in total

1.  Bayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationships.

Authors:  Mana Dembo; Nicholas J Matzke; Arne Ø Mooers; Mark Collard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Island Rule, quantitative genetics and brain-body size evolution in Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho; Pasquale Raia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Indonesia.

Authors:  Thomas Sutikna; Matthew W Tocheri; Michael J Morwood; E Wahyu Saptomo; Rokus Due Awe; Sri Wasisto; Kira E Westaway; Maxime Aubert; Bo Li; Jian-xin Zhao; Michael Storey; Brent V Alloway; Mike W Morley; Hanneke J M Meijer; Gerrit D van den Bergh; Rainer Grün; Anthony Dosseto; Adam Brumm; William L Jungers; Richard G Roberts
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Homo floresiensis-like fossils from the early Middle Pleistocene of Flores.

Authors:  Gerrit D van den Bergh; Yousuke Kaifu; Iwan Kurniawan; Reiko T Kono; Adam Brumm; Erick Setiyabudi; Fachroel Aziz; Michael J Morwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  New fossil remains of Homo naledi from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.

Authors:  John Hawks; Marina Elliott; Peter Schmid; Steven E Churchill; Darryl J de Ruiter; Eric M Roberts; Hannah Hilbert-Wolf; Heather M Garvin; Scott A Williams; Lucas K Delezene; Elen M Feuerriegel; Patrick Randolph-Quinney; Tracy L Kivell; Myra F Laird; Gaokgatlhe Tawane; Jeremy M DeSilva; Shara E Bailey; Juliet K Brophy; Marc R Meyer; Matthew M Skinner; Matthew W Tocheri; Caroline VanSickle; Christopher S Walker; Timothy L Campbell; Brian Kuhn; Ashley Kruger; Steven Tucker; Alia Gurtov; Nompumelelo Hlophe; Rick Hunter; Hannah Morris; Becca Peixotto; Maropeng Ramalepa; Dirk van Rooyen; Mathabela Tsikoane; Pedro Boshoff; Paul Hgm Dirks; Lee R Berger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Widespread Denisovan ancestry in Island Southeast Asia but no evidence of substantial super-archaic hominin admixture.

Authors:  Raymond Tobler; Chris S M Turney; Alan Cooper; Kristofer M Helgen; João C Teixeira; Guy S Jacobs; Chris Stringer; Jonathan Tuke; Georgi Hudjashov; Gludhug A Purnomo; Herawati Sudoyo; Murray P Cox
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  The cranial biomechanics and feeding performance of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Rebecca W Cook; Antonino Vazzana; Rita Sorrentino; Stefano Benazzi; Amanda L Smith; David S Strait; Justin A Ledogar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Rare events in earth history include the LB1 human skeleton from Flores, Indonesia, as a developmental singularity, not a unique taxon.

Authors:  Robert B Eckhardt; Maciej Henneberg; Alex S Weller; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evolved developmental homeostasis disturbed in LB1 from Flores, Indonesia, denotes Down syndrome and not diagnostic traits of the invalid species Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Maciej Henneberg; Robert B Eckhardt; Sakdapong Chavanaves; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.