Literature DB >> 22035452

Patterns of range-wide genetic variation in six North American bumble bee (Apidae: Bombus) species.

Jeffrey D Lozier1, James P Strange, Isaac J Stewart, Sydney A Cameron.   

Abstract

The increasing evidence for population declines in bumble bee (Bombus) species worldwide has accelerated research efforts to explain losses in these important pollinators. In North America, a number of once widespread Bombus species have suffered serious reductions in range and abundance, although other species remain healthy. To examine whether declining and stable species exhibit different levels of genetic diversity or population fragmentation, we used microsatellite markers to genotype populations sampled across the geographic distributions of two declining (Bombus occidentalis and Bombus pensylvanicus) and four stable (Bombus bifarius; Bombus vosnesenskii; Bombus impatiens and Bombus bimaculatus) Bombus species. Populations of declining species generally have reduced levels of genetic diversity throughout their range compared to codistributed stable species. Genetic diversity can be affected by overall range size and degree of isolation of local populations, potentially confounding comparisons among species in some cases. We find no evidence for consistent differences in gene flow among stable and declining species, with all species exhibiting weak genetic differentiation over large distances (e.g. >1000 km). Populations on islands and at high elevations experience relatively strong genetic drift, suggesting that some conditions lead to genetic isolation in otherwise weakly differentiated species. B. occidentalis and B. bifarius exhibit stronger genetic differentiation than the other species, indicating greater phylogeographic structure consistent with their broader geographic distributions across topographically complex regions of western North America. Screening genetic diversity in North American Bombus should prove useful for identifying species that warrant monitoring, and developing management strategies that promote high levels of gene flow will be a key component in efforts to maintain healthy populations.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035452     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  27 in total

1.  Patterns of selection and polymorphism of innate immunity genes in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  J S Ellis; L M Turner; M E Knight
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Macronutrient ratios in pollen shape bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) foraging strategies and floral preferences.

Authors:  Anthony D Vaudo; Harland M Patch; David A Mortensen; John F Tooker; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism scan suggests adaptation to urbanization in an important pollinator, the red-tailed bumblebee (Bombus lapidarius L.).

Authors:  Panagiotis Theodorou; Rita Radzevičiūtė; Belinda Kahnt; Antonella Soro; Ivo Grosse; Robert J Paxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The genomes of two key bumblebee species with primitive eusocial organization.

Authors:  Ben M Sadd; Seth M Barribeau; Guy Bloch; Dirk C de Graaf; Peter Dearden; Christine G Elsik; Jürgen Gadau; Cornelis J P Grimmelikhuijzen; Martin Hasselmann; Jeffrey D Lozier; Hugh M Robertson; Guy Smagghe; Eckart Stolle; Matthias Van Vaerenbergh; Robert M Waterhouse; Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Steffen Klasberg; Anna K Bennett; Francisco Câmara; Roderic Guigó; Katharina Hoff; Marco Mariotti; Monica Munoz-Torres; Terence Murphy; Didac Santesmasses; Gro V Amdam; Matthew Beckers; Martin Beye; Matthias Biewer; Márcia M G Bitondi; Mark L Blaxter; Andrew F G Bourke; Mark J F Brown; Severine D Buechel; Rossanah Cameron; Kaat Cappelle; James C Carolan; Olivier Christiaens; Kate L Ciborowski; David F Clarke; Thomas J Colgan; David H Collins; Andrew G Cridge; Tamas Dalmay; Stephanie Dreier; Louis du Plessis; Elizabeth Duncan; Silvio Erler; Jay Evans; Tiago Falcon; Kevin Flores; Flávia C P Freitas; Taro Fuchikawa; Tanja Gempe; Klaus Hartfelder; Frank Hauser; Sophie Helbing; Fernanda C Humann; Frano Irvine; Lars S Jermiin; Claire E Johnson; Reed M Johnson; Andrew K Jones; Tatsuhiko Kadowaki; Jonathan H Kidner; Vasco Koch; Arian Köhler; F Bernhard Kraus; H Michael G Lattorff; Megan Leask; Gabrielle A Lockett; Eamonn B Mallon; David S Marco Antonio; Monika Marxer; Ivan Meeus; Robin F A Moritz; Ajay Nair; Kathrin Näpflin; Inga Nissen; Jinzhi Niu; Francis M F Nunes; John G Oakeshott; Amy Osborne; Marianne Otte; Daniel G Pinheiro; Nina Rossié; Olav Rueppell; Carolina G Santos; Regula Schmid-Hempel; Björn D Schmitt; Christina Schulte; Zilá L P Simões; Michelle P M Soares; Luc Swevers; Eva C Winnebeck; Florian Wolschin; Na Yu; Evgeny M Zdobnov; Peshtewani K Aqrawi; Kerstin P Blankenburg; Marcus Coyle; Liezl Francisco; Alvaro G Hernandez; Michael Holder; Matthew E Hudson; LaRonda Jackson; Joy Jayaseelan; Vandita Joshi; Christie Kovar; Sandra L Lee; Robert Mata; Tittu Mathew; Irene F Newsham; Robin Ngo; Geoffrey Okwuonu; Christopher Pham; Ling-Ling Pu; Nehad Saada; Jireh Santibanez; DeNard Simmons; Rebecca Thornton; Aarti Venkat; Kimberly K O Walden; Yuan-Qing Wu; Griet Debyser; Bart Devreese; Claire Asher; Julie Blommaert; Ariel D Chipman; Lars Chittka; Bertrand Fouks; Jisheng Liu; Meaghan P O'Neill; Seirian Sumner; Daniela Puiu; Jiaxin Qu; Steven L Salzberg; Steven E Scherer; Donna M Muzny; Stephen Richards; Gene E Robinson; Richard A Gibbs; Paul Schmid-Hempel; Kim C Worley
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 13.583

5.  Nest suitability, fine-scale population structure and male-mediated dispersal of a solitary ground nesting bee in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Margarita M López-Uribe; Stephen J Morreale; Christine K Santiago; Bryan N Danforth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Microsatellite Analysis of Museum Specimens Reveals Historical Differences in Genetic Diversity between Declining and More Stable Bombus Species.

Authors:  Kevin Maebe; Ivan Meeus; Maarten Ganne; Thibaut De Meulemeester; Koos Biesmeijer; Guy Smagghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Conservation insights from wild bee genetic studies: Geographic differences, susceptibility to inbreeding, and signs of local adaptation.

Authors:  Evan P Kelemen; Sandra M Rehan
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Lack of variation at phosphoglucose isomerase (pgi) in bumblebees: implications for conservation genetics studies.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellis; Lucy M Turner; Mairi E Knight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Impacts of Neonicotinoids on the Bumble Bees Bombus terrestris and Bombus impatiens Examined through the Lens of an Adverse Outcome Pathway Framework.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.218

10.  Effects of the Neonicotinoid Acetamiprid in Pollen on Bombus impatiens Microcolony Development.

Authors:  Allison A Camp; Michael A Batres; Wanda C Williams; Robert W Koethe; Kimberly A Stoner; David M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.