Literature DB >> 2203521

Analysis of dietary fat, calories, body weight, and the development of mammary tumors in rats and mice: a review.

L S Freedman1, C Clifford, M Messina.   

Abstract

We have extracted from the literature data from 100 animal experiments, involving 7838 rats and mice, which compared the effects of different levels of dietary fat and/or calorie intake on the development of mammary tumors. Both higher calorie intake (P less than 0.0001) and higher fat intake (P less than 0.0001) independently increased mammary tumor incidence in Sprague-Dawley rats and in mice, as judged from analyses combining ad libitum feeding experiments and restricted feeding experiments. The effect of fat was two thirds the magnitude of the calorie effect in both Sprague-Dawley rats and mice. In ad libitum feeding experiments, a modest but significant (P less than 0.0001) average increase in body weight was found in animals fed high fat diets. However, these differences in body weight did not correspond to differences in mammary tumor incidence. The effect of log body weight on the log odds of tumor incidence was not significant (P = 0.16), while dietary fat intake significantly increased tumor incidence (P less than 0.0001). The collection of animal experimental data supports the hypothesis that, in mammary tumor development, there is a specific enhancing effect of dietary fat, as well as a general enhancing effect of calories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2203521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  34 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer hypothesis: a single cause for the majority of cases.

Authors:  R A Wiseman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Dietary fat and breast cancer.

Authors:  K K Carroll
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.880

Review 3.  Impact of obesity on development and progression of mammary tumors in preclinical models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Margot P Cleary
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Regression calibration in nutritional epidemiology: example of fat density and total energy in relationship to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Cynthia A Thomson; Karen C Johnson; Jeannette Beasley; Garnet Anderson; James M Shikany; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Nutrition and breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Hunter; W C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Dietary energy availability affects primary and metastatic breast cancer and metformin efficacy.

Authors:  Kathryn N Phoenix; Frank Vumbaca; Melissa M Fox; Rebecca Evans; Kevin P Claffey
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Lifestyle changes during adolescence and risk of breast cancer: an ecologic study of the effect of World War II in Norway.

Authors:  S Tretli; M Gaard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Metabolism and immunity in breast cancer.

Authors:  Deyu Zhang; Xiaojie Xu; Qinong Ye
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Dietary Fat Intake During Adolescence and Breast Density Among Young Women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Olga Goloubeva; Catherine Klifa; Erin S LeBlanc; Linda G Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A Mediterranean dietary intervention in healthy American women changes plasma carotenoids and fatty acids in distinct clusters.

Authors:  Zora Djuric; Jianwei Ren; Jason Blythe; Glee VanLoon; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.