Literature DB >> 22035177

Visual guidance of recovery from lens-induced myopia in tree shrews (Tupaia glis belangeri).

Angela O Amedo1, Thomas T Norton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine, in tree shrews, the visual guidance of recovery from negative lens-induced myopia by measuring the effect of wearing low-power negative or positive lenses during recovery. To learn if removing a negative lens for 2 h per day, after compensation has occurred, is sufficient to produce recovery.
METHODS: Starting 16 days after natural eye opening (days of visual experience), juvenile tree shrews wore a monocular -5 D lens for 11 days to produce compensation (age-appropriate refraction while wearing the lens). Recovery in four groups was started by discontinuing -5 D lens wear, which caused the treated eyes to be refractively myopic, and substituting: no lens (n = 7), a plano lens (n = 8), a -2 D lens (n = 6) or a +2 D lens (n = 10). In a fifth group (n = 6), the -5 D lens was removed for 2 h each day but worn the remainder of the time. Non-cycloplegic refractive measurements were made daily for the first 10 days and then less frequently. After 31-35 days, the lens-guided recovery period was ended for most animals; periodic measures were continued to assess post-lens recovery changes.
RESULTS: All the eyes responded to the -5 D lens and were myopic (-4.8 ± 0.1 D, mean ± S.E.M.) compared to the untreated fellow control eye. In all groups except the -2 D lens group, some animals exhibited slow or incomplete recovery. During recovery, the treated eye of most animals recovered until its refraction, measured with the recovery-lens in place, was near to that of the control eye. Measured without the lens, the -2 D group was myopic and the +2 D group was hyperopic. With the lens in place, the plano-lens, -2 D lens, and +2 D lens groups remained slightly myopic (-1.0 ± 0.3 D, -0.6 ± 0.2 D and -1.3 ± 0.1 D, respectively). The rate of recovery during the first four days was unrelated to the amount of myopia initially experienced by the recovering eyes. Removal of the -5 D lens for 2 h each day produced recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: During recovery, the emmetropization mechanism uses the presence of myopia, but perhaps not the magnitude, to guide eyes toward a refractive state similar to the control eye, regardless of whether the optically-recovered eye is longer or shorter than the fellow control eye. Wearing a goggle frame containing a lens of any power limits the recovery. The recovery signal can be intermittent, present for only 2 h per day, and still mediate recovery in competition with increasing amounts of hyperopia as recovery progresses. Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
© 2011 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22035177      PMCID: PMC3278587          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00875.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  33 in total

Review 1.  Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia.

Authors:  Josh Wallman; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The susceptible period for deprivation-induced myopia in tree shrew.

Authors:  J T Siegwart; T T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Animal Models of Myopia: Learning How Vision Controls the Size of the Eye.

Authors:  Thomas T. Norton
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  1999-03

4.  Regulation of the mechanical properties of tree shrew sclera by the visual environment.

Authors:  J T Siegwart; T T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Active emmetropization--evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice.

Authors:  C F Wildsoet
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Normal development of refractive state and ocular component dimensions in the tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri).

Authors:  T T Norton; N A McBrien
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Recovery from form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Ying Qiao-Grider; Li-Fang Hung; Chea-su Kee; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Mathematical model of emmetropization in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H C Howland
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  20 in total

1.  Complement factors C1q, C3 and C5b-9 in the posterior sclera of guinea pigs with negative lens-defocused myopia.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Gao; Qin Long; Xue Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Recovery of peripheral refractive errors and ocular shape in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with experimentally induced myopia.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Li-Fang Hung; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Alterations in protein expression in tree shrew sclera during development of lens-induced myopia and recovery.

Authors:  Michael R Frost; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Integration of defocus by dual power Fresnel lenses inhibits myopia in the mammalian eye.

Authors:  Sally A McFadden; Dennis Y Tse; Hannah E Bowrey; Amelia J Leotta; Carly S Lam; Christine F Wildsoet; Chi-Ho To
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Juvenile Tree Shrews Do Not Maintain Emmetropia in Narrow-band Blue Light.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  Response to interrupted hyperopia after restraint of axial elongation in tree shrews.

Authors:  John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Gene expression signatures in tree shrew choroid during lens-induced myopia and recovery.

Authors:  Li He; Michael R Frost; John T Siegwart; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Negative lens-induced myopia in infant monkeys: effects of high ambient lighting.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Juan Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.