P Magin1, D Pond, W Smith, S Goode, N Paterson. 1. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. parker.magin@necastle.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most commonly used measure of skin type. In questionnaire-based surveys, self-rated FSPC is often used as a measure of respondents' skin type. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess test-retest reliability of the self-rated FSPC within a 12-month cohort study that examined the psychological sequelae of acne. METHODS: Participants were students aged 14-17 years in four Australian secondary schools; two-government system schools and two private schools. The primary outcomes were a number of psychological measures. The FSPC was assessed by a single concise questionnaire item. Test-retest agreement (as measured by quadratic weighted kappa) of participants' self-rated FSPC at three time-points (baseline, 6 and 12 months) was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 244 participating students, 209 students (86%) completed all three rounds of data collection. A further 26 students (11%) completed two rounds. Quadratic weighted kappa for Rounds 1 and 2 was 0.757 (95% CI 0.663-0.831). For Rounds 2 and 3 it was 0.805 (95% CI 0.659-0.893). Between Rounds 1 and 3 it was 0.767 (95% CI 0.698-0.832). This represents good-to-very-good agreement. Skin type was retained as an independent variable in 8 of the 16 regression models built to explain psychological outcomes in this study. CONCLUSION: Skin type appears to be a significant factor in psychological morbidity in acne. The FSPC is a reliable method for assessing skin phenotype, even when elicited via a concise questionnaire item suitable for assessing skin type as a potential confounder in studies of other outcome factors.
BACKGROUND: The Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype Classification (FSPC) is the most commonly used measure of skin type. In questionnaire-based surveys, self-rated FSPC is often used as a measure of respondents' skin type. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess test-retest reliability of the self-rated FSPC within a 12-month cohort study that examined the psychological sequelae of acne. METHODS:Participants were students aged 14-17 years in four Australian secondary schools; two-government system schools and two private schools. The primary outcomes were a number of psychological measures. The FSPC was assessed by a single concise questionnaire item. Test-retest agreement (as measured by quadratic weighted kappa) of participants' self-rated FSPC at three time-points (baseline, 6 and 12 months) was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 244 participating students, 209 students (86%) completed all three rounds of data collection. A further 26 students (11%) completed two rounds. Quadratic weighted kappa for Rounds 1 and 2 was 0.757 (95% CI 0.663-0.831). For Rounds 2 and 3 it was 0.805 (95% CI 0.659-0.893). Between Rounds 1 and 3 it was 0.767 (95% CI 0.698-0.832). This represents good-to-very-good agreement. Skin type was retained as an independent variable in 8 of the 16 regression models built to explain psychological outcomes in this study. CONCLUSION: Skin type appears to be a significant factor in psychological morbidity in acne. The FSPC is a reliable method for assessing skin phenotype, even when elicited via a concise questionnaire item suitable for assessing skin type as a potential confounder in studies of other outcome factors.