Literature DB >> 22034854

The relationship between oxygen uptake reserve and heart rate reserve is affected by intensity and duration during aerobic exercise at constant work rate.

Felipe A Cunha1, Adrian W Midgley, Walace D Monteiro, Felipe K Campos, Paulo T V Farinatti.   

Abstract

The relationship between the percentage of heart rate reserve (%HRR) and percentage of oxygen uptake reserve (%VO₂R) has been recommended for prescribing aerobic exercise intensity. However, this relationship was derived from progressive maximal exercise testing data, and the stability of the relationship during prolonged exercise at a constant work rate has not been established. The main aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the %VO₂R-%HRR relationship during prolonged treadmill exercise bouts performed at 3 different constant work rates. Twenty-eight men performed 4 exercise tests: (i) a ramp-incremental maximal exercise test to determine maximal heart rate (HR(max)) and maximal oxygen uptake (VO₂(max)) and (ii) three 40-min exercise bouts at 60%, 70%, and 80% VO₂R. HR and VO₂ significantly increased over time and were influenced by exercise intensity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). A 1:1 relationship between %HRR and %VO₂R, and between %HRR and %VO₂(max), was not observed, with mean differences of 8% (t = 5.2, p < 0.001) and 6% (t = 4.8, p < 0.001), respectively. The VO₂ values predicted from the ACSM running equation were all significantly higher than the observed VO₂ values (p < 0.001 for all comparisons), whereas a difference for HR was observed only for the tenth min of exercise at 80% VO₂R (p = 0.041). In conclusion, the main finding of this study was that the %HRR-%VO₂R relationship determined by linear regression, obtained from progressive maximal exercise testing, did not apply to prolonged treadmill running performed at 3 work rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22034854     DOI: 10.1139/h11-100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  7 in total

1.  How long does it take to achieve steady state for an accurate assessment of resting VO₂ in healthy men?

Authors:  Felipe A Cunha; Adrian W Midgley; Walace Monteiro; Raul Freire; Tainah Lima; Paulo T V Farinatti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Methods of prescribing relative exercise intensity: physiological and practical considerations.

Authors:  Theresa Mann; Robert Patrick Lamberts; Michael Ian Lambert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effect of steady-state aerobic exercise intensity and duration on the relationship between reserves of heart rate and oxygen uptake.

Authors:  Carlo Ferri Marini; Ario Federici; James S Skinner; Giovanni Piccoli; Vilberto Stocchi; Luca Zoffoli; Luca Correale; Stefano Dell'Anna; Carlo Alberto Naldini; Matteo Vandoni; Francesco Lucertini
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Influence of exercise modality on agreement between gas exchange and heart rate variability thresholds.

Authors:  F A Cunha; R A Montenegro; A W Midgley; F Vasconcellos; P P Soares; P Farinatti
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.590

5.  Study of the relationship between the aerobic capacity (VO2 max) and the rating of perceived exertion based on the measurement of heart beat in the metal industries Esfahan.

Authors:  Ehsanollah Habibi; Habibollah Dehghan; Mohammad Moghiseh; Akbar Hasanzadeh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-06-23

6.  VO2 Reserve vs. Heart Rate Reserve During Moderate Intensity Treadmill Exercise.

Authors:  Tanner J Solheim; Brad G Keller; Charles J Fountaine
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Postexercise hypotension and related hemodynamic responses to cycling under heat stress in untrained men with elevated blood pressure.

Authors:  Felipe A Cunha; Paulo Farinatti; Helen Jones; Adrian W Midgley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.