Literature DB >> 22033327

Physicians' preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Laure Benjamin1, François-Emery Cotté, Caroline Philippe, Florence Mercier, Thomas Bachelot, Gwenaëlle Vidal-Trécan.   

Abstract

Although efficacy and tolerability are classical criteria for treatment choice, patient adherence and tariff issues related to novel oral anticancer drugs may also influence therapeutic decisions. We estimated the relative influence of efficacy, tolerability, expected adherence and route of administration of a chemotherapy treatment on 203 French physicians' preferences who participated in a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), a quantitative method used to elicit preferences. From a questionnaire with six scenarii, respondents had to choose between two treatments which differed with respect to these four attributes. Scenarii were first presented in a curative setting then in a palliative setting. Efficacy, tolerability and expected adherence had two modalities (good versus moderate) and route of administration had three modalities (intravenous (€286-379/session), oral with the current tariff (€28/consultation), oral with a hypothetical tariff (€114)). Efficacy was the reference criterion in choosing a treatment whatever the therapeutic goal (β: 2.114, p<0.0001 in curative setting versus β: 1.063, p<0.0001 in palliative setting). The oral route of administration was important but only in a palliative setting (β: 0.612, p=0.035, and β: 0.506, p<0.0001 for the current and hypothetical tariff, respectively). Removing the efficacy attribute from logistic regression model, tolerability (β: 1.228, p=0.0001) and expected adherence (β: 1.223, p=0.0001) were influent in curative setting while the route of administration was still predominant in palliative setting (β: 0.431, p<0.0001). Results suggest that economic considerations as well as therapeutic efficacy play a significant role in choosing a treatment. Preference for oral chemotherapy with a hypothetical tariff for a patient support programme should be considered for the development of therapeutic education and healthcare coordination, currently not taken into account in the tariff of oral chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033327     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  12 in total

Review 1.  Oral anticancer drugs: mechanisms of low bioavailability and strategies for improvement.

Authors:  Frederik E Stuurman; Bastiaan Nuijen; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Physician Preferences and Shared-Decision Making for the Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Discrete-Choice Experiment Study in China.

Authors:  Juntao Yan; Yan Wei; Yue Teng; Shimeng Liu; Fuming Li; Shiyi Bao; Yanfeng Ren; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Association between cognitive impairment and oral anticancer agent use in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jessica E Pritchard; Lauren E Wilson; Samuel M Miller; Melissa A Greiner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Deborah R Kaye; Tian Zhang; Michaela A Dinan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 7.538

Review 4.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Vikas Soekhai; Caitlin Thomas; Anne Brooks; Ella Brookes; Rachel Lo; Sarah Mulnick; Sebastian Heidenreich
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Impact of the healthcare payment system on patient access to oral anticancer drugs: an illustration from the French and United States contexts.

Authors:  Laure Benjamin; Valérie Buthion; Gwenaëlle Vidal-Trécan; Pascal Briot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Discrete-choice modelling of patient preferences for modes of drug administration.

Authors:  Ebenezer Kwabena Tetteh; Steve Morris; Nigel Titcheneker-Hooker
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-07-27

8.  Patient and physician preferences for anticancer drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Juan Marcos González; Sarika Ogale; Robert Morlock; Joshua Posner; Brett Hauber; Nicolas Sommer; Axel Grothey
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Determination of the absolute bioavailability of oral imatinib using a stable isotopically labeled intravenous imatinib-d8 microdose.

Authors:  Jeroen Roosendaal; Stefanie L Groenland; Hilde Rosing; Luc Lucas; Nikkie Venekamp; Bastiaan Nuijen; Alwin D R Huitema; Jos H Beijnen; Neeltje Steeghs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Physician preferences for chemotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in China: evidence from multicentre discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Hui Sun; Huishan Wang; Lizheng Shi; Meifeng Wang; Junling Li; Jufang Shi; Ming Ni; Xianzhi Hu; Yingyao Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.