PURPOSE: A phase II study of temsirolimus was conducted in children and adolescents with high-grade glioma, neuroblastoma or rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Temsirolimus 75 mg/m(2) was administered once weekly until disease progression or intolerance. Using the Simon 2-stage design, further enrolment in each disease cohort required ≥ 2 objective responses within the first 12 weeks for the first 12 evaluable patients (those who received ≥ 3 temsirolimus doses). RESULTS: Fifty-two heavily pretreated patients with relapsed (12%) or refractory (88%) disease, median age 8 years (range 1-21 years), were enroled and treated. One patient with neuroblastoma achieved confirmed partial response within the first 12 weeks; thus, none of the 3 cohorts met the criterion for continued enrolment. Disease stabilisation at week 12 was observed in 7 of 17 patients (41%) with high-grade glioma (5 diffuse pontine gliomas, 1 glioblastoma multiforme and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma), 6 of 19 (32%) with neuroblastoma and 1 of 16 (6%) with rhabdomyosarcoma (partial response confirmed at week 18). In the three cohorts, median duration of stable disease or better was 128, 663 and 75 d, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopaenia, hyperlipidaemia and aesthenia. Pharmacokinetic findings were similar to those observed in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Temsirolimus administered weekly at the dose of 75 mg/m(2) did not meet the primary objective efficacy threshold in children with high-grade glioma, neuroblastoma or rhabdomyosarcoma; however, meaningful prolonged stable disease merits further evaluation in combination therapy.
PURPOSE: A phase II study of temsirolimus was conducted in children and adolescents with high-grade glioma, neuroblastoma or rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Temsirolimus 75 mg/m(2) was administered once weekly until disease progression or intolerance. Using the Simon 2-stage design, further enrolment in each disease cohort required ≥ 2 objective responses within the first 12 weeks for the first 12 evaluable patients (those who received ≥ 3 temsirolimus doses). RESULTS: Fifty-two heavily pretreated patients with relapsed (12%) or refractory (88%) disease, median age 8 years (range 1-21 years), were enroled and treated. One patient with neuroblastoma achieved confirmed partial response within the first 12 weeks; thus, none of the 3 cohorts met the criterion for continued enrolment. Disease stabilisation at week 12 was observed in 7 of 17 patients (41%) with high-grade glioma (5 diffuse pontine gliomas, 1 glioblastoma multiforme and 1 anaplastic astrocytoma), 6 of 19 (32%) with neuroblastoma and 1 of 16 (6%) with rhabdomyosarcoma (partial response confirmed at week 18). In the three cohorts, median duration of stable disease or better was 128, 663 and 75 d, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopaenia, hyperlipidaemia and aesthenia. Pharmacokinetic findings were similar to those observed in adults. CONCLUSIONS:Temsirolimus administered weekly at the dose of 75 mg/m(2) did not meet the primary objective efficacy threshold in children with high-grade glioma, neuroblastoma or rhabdomyosarcoma; however, meaningful prolonged stable disease merits further evaluation in combination therapy.
Authors: Malcolm A Smith; Nita L Seibel; Sean F Altekruse; Lynn A G Ries; Danielle L Melbert; Maura O'Leary; Franklin O Smith; Gregory H Reaman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J I Johnsen; L Segerström; A Orrego; L Elfman; M Henriksson; B Kågedal; S Eksborg; B Sveinbjörnsson; P Kogner Journal: Oncogene Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Boris Shor; Wei-Guo Zhang; Lourdes Toral-Barza; Jessica Lucas; Robert T Abraham; James J Gibbons; Ker Yu Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Georg Hess; Raoul Herbrecht; Jorge Romaguera; Gregor Verhoef; Michael Crump; Christian Gisselbrecht; Anna Laurell; Fritz Offner; Andrew Strahs; Anna Berkenblit; Orysia Hanushevsky; Jill Clancy; Becker Hewes; Laurence Moore; Bertrand Coiffier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gregory T Armstrong; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui; Joseph P Neglia; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gregory T Armstrong; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui; Sujuan Huang; Kirsten K Ness; Wendy Leisenring; Melissa M Hudson; Sarah S Donaldson; Allison A King; Marilyn Stovall; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Roger J Packer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Simone Hettmer; Zhizhong Li; Andrew N Billin; Frederic G Barr; D D W Cornelison; Alan R Ehrlich; Denis C Guttridge; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Lee J Helman; Peter J Houghton; Javed Khan; David M Langenau; Corinne M Linardic; Ranadip Pal; Terence A Partridge; Grace K Pavlath; Rossella Rota; Beat W Schäfer; Janet Shipley; Bruce Stillman; Leonard H Wexler; Amy J Wagers; Charles Keller Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 6.915
Authors: Viswanath Reddy Belum; Courtney Washington; Christine A Pratilas; Vincent Sibaud; Franck Boralevi; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Catalina Ruiz-Mesa; John M Goldberg; Alvaro J Coronado Munoz; Sarah N Dumont; Jonathan C Trent Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2015-06
Authors: Don W Coulter; Christine Walko; Jai Patel; Billie M Moats-Staats; Andrew McFadden; Scott V Smith; Wasiuddin A Khan; Arlene S Bridges; Allison M Deal; Javier Oesterheld; Ian J Davis; Julie Blatt Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.248