Literature DB >> 22032914

Call combinations in monkeys: compositional or idiomatic expressions?

Kate Arnold1, Klaus Zuberbühler.   

Abstract

Syntax is widely considered the feature that most decisively sets human language apart from other natural communication systems. Animal vocalisations are generally considered to be holistic with few examples of utterances meaning something other than the sum of their parts. Previously, we have shown that male putty-nosed monkeys produce call series consisting of two call types in response to different events. They can also be combined into short sequences that convey a different message from those conveyed by either call type alone. Here, we investigate whether 'pyow-hack' sequences are compositional in that the individual calls contribute to their overall meaning. However, the monkeys behaved as if they perceived the sequence as an idiomatic expression rather than decoding the sequence. Nonetheless, while this communication system lacks the generative power of syntax it enables callers to increase the number of messages that can be conveyed by a small and innate call repertoire. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032914     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  23 in total

1.  Why is combinatorial communication rare in the natural world, and why is language an exception to this trend?

Authors:  Thomas C Scott-Phillips; Richard A Blythe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Principles of structure building in music, language and animal song.

Authors:  Martin Rohrmeier; Willem Zuidema; Geraint A Wiggins; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Language evolution: syntax before phonology?

Authors:  Katie Collier; Balthasar Bickel; Carel P van Schaik; Marta B Manser; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Animal vocal sequences: not the Markov chains we thought they were.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Ann E Bowles; Todd M Freeberg; Dezhe Z Jin; Adriano R Lameira; Kirsten Bohn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  The syntax-semantics interface in animal vocal communication.

Authors:  Toshitaka N Suzuki; David Wheatcroft; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Meaningful call combinations and compositional processing in the southern pied babbler.

Authors:  Sabrina Engesser; Amanda R Ridley; Simon W Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Syntax and compositionality in animal communication.

Authors:  Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Differentiation Between Agents and Patients in the Putative Two-Word Stage of Language Evolution.

Authors:  Petar Gabrić
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-08-11

9.  Stability of referential signalling across time and locations: testing alarm calls of Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen) in urban and rural Australia and in Fiji.

Authors:  Gisela Kaplan; Lesley J Rogers
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Female putty-nosed monkeys use experimentally altered contextual information to disambiguate the cause of male alarm calls.

Authors:  Kate Arnold; Klaus Zuberbühler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.