Literature DB >> 22032910

Less correspondence between expectations before and cosmetic results after risk-reducing mastectomy in women who are mutation carriers: a prospective study.

Y Brandberg1, B Arver, H Johansson, M Wickman, K Sandelin, A Liljegren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to describe satisfaction with the cosmetic results six months and one year after risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) with immediate breast reconstruction. Another aim was to ascertain associations between ratings on "correspondence between the overall results and expectations before RRM" and age, mutation carrier status, salpingo-oophorectomy (SOE) before RRM, body image, and with sexual pleasure and discomfort.
METHODS: 91/100 women who underwent RRM between 1997 and 2005 were included. Assessments were made six and twelve months after RRM with questionnaires regarding satisfaction with the cosmetic results, sexuality (SAQ), and body image (BIS).
RESULTS: At both assessment points, >70% of the women considered the overall results of RRM to correspond to their expectations. Over 80% were satisfied with the size of their breasts, but 49% indicated at the one-year assessment that at least one breast was too hard and 73% indicated that they had no or only minor sensitivity in the breasts. In the univariate analyses, associations between "correspondence between the overall results and expectations before RRM" and mutation carrier status (p = 0.039) and SOE (p = 0.025) were found, but only mutation carrier status remained in the multivariate analysis (0.037).
CONCLUSION: The majority of the women reported that the results of RRM corresponded to their expectations, with lower levels of correspondence in mutation carriers than in non-carriers. Overall satisfaction with the cosmetic result was high, but a majority of the women were unsatisfied with the softness of the reconstructed breasts. These results can be useful when informing patients about RRM.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032910     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Dmytro Unukovych; Hemming Johansson; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Waljee; Evan P McGlinn; Erika Davis Sears; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Shantanu N Razdan; Vishal Patel; Sarah Jewell; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Influences on Satisfaction with Reconstructed Breasts and Intimacy in Younger Women Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: a Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Rachael Glassey; Moira O'Connor; Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Sarah J Hardcastle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Nora E Carbine; Liz Lostumbo; Judi Wallace; Henry Ko
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.

Authors:  Ranjit Manchanda; Rosa Legood; Matthew Burnell; Alistair McGuire; Maria Raikou; Kelly Loggenberg; Jane Wardle; Saskia Sanderson; Sue Gessler; Lucy Side; Nyala Balogun; Rakshit Desai; Ajith Kumar; Huw Dorkins; Yvonne Wallis; Cyril Chapman; Rohan Taylor; Chris Jacobs; Ian Tomlinson; Uziel Beller; Usha Menon; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  The Aesthetic Items Scale: A Tool for the Evaluation of Aesthetic Outcome after Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Rieky E G Dikmans; Lauren E H Nene; Mark-Bram Bouman; Henrica C W de Vet; Marc A M Mureau; Marlon E Buncamper; Hay A H Winters; Marco J P F Ritt; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Concerns and Expectations of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Women with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

Authors:  Paola Modaffari; Riccardo Ponzone; Alberta Ferrari; Isabella Cipullo; Viola Liberale; Marta D'Alonzo; Furio Maggiorotto; Nicoletta Biglia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Multigene Testing for All Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Li Sun; Adam Brentnall; Shreeya Patel; Diana S M Buist; Erin J A Bowles; D Gareth R Evans; Diana Eccles; John Hopper; Shuai Li; Melissa Southey; Stephen Duffy; Jack Cuzick; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Alec Miners; Zia Sadique; Li Yang; Rosa Legood; Ranjit Manchanda
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 31.777

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.