Literature DB >> 22032756

Combining clinical relevance and statistical significance for evaluating quality of life changes in the individual patient.

C B Terwee, B Terluin, D L Knol, H C W de Vet.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22032756     DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN： 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  The minimal important change for the EQ VAS based on the SF-36 health transition item: observations from 25772 spine surgery procedures.

Authors:  Anders Joelson; Fredrik Nerelius; Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Jan Karlsson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 2.  The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take.

Authors:  T H P Draak; B T A de Greef; C G Faber; I S J Merkies
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 6.089

Review 3.  Between-group minimally important change versus individual treatment responders.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; John Devin Peipert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.147
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.