OBJECTIVES: The impact of individual antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on mortality and hospital stay in atrial fibrillation (AF) was evaluated. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in AF patients receiving pharmacologic rhythm control therapy have not been compared with rate control therapy on the basis of AAD selection. METHODS: We compared CV outcomes in the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial in subgroups defined by the initial AAD selected with propensity score matched subgroups from the rate arm (Rate). RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-nine amiodarone patients, 606 sotalol patients, and 268 Class 1C patients were matched. The composite outcome of mortality or cardiovascular hospital stays (CVH) showed better outcomes with Rate compared with amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.36, p = 0.02), sotalol (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.54, p < 0.001), and Class 1C (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.56, p = 0.10). There was a nonsignificant increase in mortality with amiodarone (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.53, p = 0.15) with the risk of non-CV death being significantly higher with amiodarone versus Rate (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.24, p = 0.04). First CVH event rates at 3 years were 47% for amiodarone, 50% for sotalol, and 44% for Class 1C versus 40%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, for Rate (amiodarone HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.40, p = 0.02, sotalol HR: 1.364, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.611, p < 0.001, Class 1C HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.60, p = 0.09). Time to CVH with intensive care unit stay or death was shorter with amiodarone (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In AFFIRM, composite mortality and CVH outcomes differed for Rate and AADs due to differences in CVH; CVH event rates during follow-up were high for all cohorts, but they were higher for all groups on AADs. Death, intensive care unit hospital stay, and non-CV death were more frequent with amiodarone.
OBJECTIVES: The impact of individual antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on mortality and hospital stay in atrial fibrillation (AF) was evaluated. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in AFpatients receiving pharmacologic rhythm control therapy have not been compared with rate control therapy on the basis of AAD selection. METHODS: We compared CV outcomes in the AFFIRM (Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management) trial in subgroups defined by the initial AAD selected with propensity score matched subgroups from the rate arm (Rate). RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-nine amiodaronepatients, 606 sotalolpatients, and 268 Class 1C patients were matched. The composite outcome of mortality or cardiovascular hospital stays (CVH) showed better outcomes with Rate compared with amiodarone (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.36, p = 0.02), sotalol (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.54, p < 0.001), and Class 1C (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.56, p = 0.10). There was a nonsignificant increase in mortality with amiodarone (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.53, p = 0.15) with the risk of non-CV death being significantly higher with amiodarone versus Rate (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.24, p = 0.04). First CVH event rates at 3 years were 47% for amiodarone, 50% for sotalol, and 44% for Class 1C versus 40%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, for Rate (amiodarone HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.40, p = 0.02, sotalol HR: 1.364, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.611, p < 0.001, Class 1C HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.60, p = 0.09). Time to CVH with intensive care unit stay or death was shorter with amiodarone (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.46, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In AFFIRM, composite mortality and CVH outcomes differed for Rate and AADs due to differences in CVH; CVH event rates during follow-up were high for all cohorts, but they were higher for all groups on AADs. Death, intensive care unit hospital stay, and non-CV death were more frequent with amiodarone.
Authors: D G Wyse; A L Waldo; J P DiMarco; M J Domanski; Y Rosenberg; E B Schron; J C Kellen; H L Greene; M C Mickel; J E Dalquist; S D Corley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Scott D Corley; Andrew E Epstein; John P DiMarco; Michael J Domanski; Nancy Geller; H Leon Greene; Richard A Josephson; Joyce C Kellen; Richard C Klein; Andrew D Krahn; Mary Mickel; L Brent Mitchell; Joy Dalquist Nelson; Yves Rosenberg; Eleanor Schron; Lynn Shemanski; Albert L Waldo; D George Wyse Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Soe Soe Thwin; Ann M Geiger; Diana S M Buist; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Reina Haque; Feifei Wei; Timothy L Lash Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jonathan S Steinberg; Ara Sadaniantz; Jack Kron; Andrew Krahn; D Marty Denny; James Daubert; W Barton Campbell; Edward Havranek; Katherine Murray; Brian Olshansky; Gearoid O'Neill; Magdi Sami; Stanley Schmidt; Randle Storm; Miguel Zabalgoitia; John Miller; Mary Chandler; Elaine M Nasco; H Leon Greene Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-03-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David J Wilber; Carlo Pappone; Petr Neuzil; Angelo De Paola; Frank Marchlinski; Andrea Natale; Laurent Macle; Emile G Daoud; Hugh Calkins; Burr Hall; Vivek Reddy; Giuseppe Augello; Matthew R Reynolds; Chandan Vinekar; Christine Y Liu; Scott M Berry; Donald A Berry Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David E Krummen; Justin Hayase; Stephen P Vampola; Gordon Ho; Amir A Schricker; Gautam G Lalani; Tina Baykaner; Taylor M Coe; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Jeffrey H Omens; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2015-09-06
Authors: Benjamin A Steinberg; Samuel H Broderick; Renato D Lopes; Linda K Shaw; Kevin L Thomas; Tracy A DeWald; James P Daubert; Eric D Peterson; Christopher B Granger; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: Europace Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Nasir Shariff; Ravi V Desai; Kanan Patel; Mustafa I Ahmed; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael W Rich; Inmaculada B Aban; Maciej Banach; Thomas E Love; Michel White; Wilbert S Aronow; Andrew E Epstein; Ali Ahmed Journal: Am J Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Benjamin A Steinberg; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Michael D Ezekowitz; Gregg C Fonarow; Peter R Kowey; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Gerald Naccarelli; James Reiffel; Paul Chang; Eric D Peterson; Jonathan P Piccini Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 4.749