Literature DB >> 22032397

The dehorning of dairy calves: practices and opinions of 639 farmers.

F Gottardo1, E Nalon, B Contiero, S Normando, P Dalvit, G Cozzi.   

Abstract

Calf dehorning is a routine husbandry practice on dairy farms that is justified by safety reasons for stockpersons and by a reduced risk of injures among herdmates. In Europe, the practice is regulated by law but little is known about the methods applied or about farmers' attitude to the practice. This study aimed to broaden the existing information on dehorning in dairy holdings by processing results of 639 farm questionnaires gathered in a traditional dairy area of northeastern Italy. Farm questionnaires were stratified according to herd size, type of housing, and productive purpose of the predominant reared breed(s). Chi-squared tests were performed to verify the significant association between a given practice or opinion and the 3 classification factors, and odd ratios were calculated. The outcomes of the study showed that dehorning was carried out on 80% of the surveyed farms, and disbudding was the method reported by all the interviewed farmers. Hot-iron cauterization was the preferred method for disbudding (91%). On average, disbudding was performed at 32 d of age and it was more likely in farms with ≥60 cows than in smaller dairy holdings (OR=7.3). The practice was carried out mainly by farm personnel, but the intervention of a veterinarian was far more likely (OR=5.98) on farms with ≤30 cows than on larger dairies. Most farmers (70%) stated that they had not received any specific training on how to perform disbudding. Fifty-two percent of the respondents reported that disbudding causes prolonged postoperative pain (≥6 h) but pain management was rare. Only 10% of the farmers used local anesthesia before cauterization, and 5% of the farmers provided calves with postoperative analgesia. Consistent with these results, farmers indicated limited willingness to pay the cost of analgesia or to call a veterinarian to perform the procedure. This low motivation of the respondents toward the adoption of practices able to reduce pain related to disbudding might arise from their insufficient knowledge on long-term negative effects of early painful experiences on behavior and handling of dairy heifers. Farmers in favor of keeping horned cows were asked about the reasons for not carrying out dehorning. Aesthetic motivations (54% of respondents) and lack of time (24%) were the main reasons cited. Moreover, a large majority of these respondents (74%) reported no difficulty in handling horned cattle.
Copyright © 2011 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032397     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

1.  A survey of drying-off practices on commercial dairy farms in northern Germany and a comparison to science-based recommendations.

Authors:  Sandra Bertulat; Carola Fischer-Tenhagen; Wolfgang Heuwieser
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2015-02-20

2.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Livestock 2.0 - genome editing for fitter, healthier, and more productive farmed animals.

Authors:  Christine Tait-Burkard; Andrea Doeschl-Wilson; Mike J McGrew; Alan L Archibald; Helen M Sang; Ross D Houston; C Bruce Whitelaw; Mick Watson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Calf aversion to hot-iron disbudding.

Authors:  Thomas Ede; Benjamin Lecorps; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of Gene Editing Versus Conventional Breeding to Introgress the POLLED Allele Into the Tropically Adapted Australian Beef Cattle Population.

Authors:  Maci L Mueller; John B Cole; Natalie K Connors; David J Johnston; Imtiaz A S Randhawa; Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 6.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Experience with the delegation of anaesthesia for disbudding and castration to trained and certified livestock owners.

Authors:  Maher Alsaaod; Marcus G Doherr; Deborah Greber; Adrian Steiner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Sublingual administration of detomidine to calves prior to disbudding: a comparison with the intravenous route.

Authors:  Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Marja R Raekallio; Kati Salla; Laura Hänninen; Elina Viitasaari; Marianna Norring; Satu Raussi; Valtteri M Rinne; Mika Scheinin; Outi M Vainio
Journal:  Vet Anaesth Analg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Topical Application of Lidocaine and Bupivacaine to Disbudding Wounds in Dairy Calves: Safety, Toxicology and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Meredith Sheil; Michael Chambers; Adam Polkinghorne; Brendan Sharpe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  An Investigation into the Perceptions of Veterinarians towards Perioperative Pain Management in Calves.

Authors:  Ria van Dyke; Melanie Connor; Amy Miele
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.