BACKGROUND: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) was proposed as the causal trigger for developing multiple sclerosis (MS). However, current data are contradictory and a gold standard for venous flow assessment is missing. OBJECTIVE: To compare structural magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and dynamic extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (ECCS) in a cohort of patients with MS. METHODS: We enrolled 40 patients (44 ± 10 years). All underwent contrast-enhanced MRV for assessment of internal jugular vein (IJV) and azygos vein (AV) narrowing, graded into 3 groups: 0%-50%, 51%-80%, and >80%. ECCS analysis of blood flow direction, cross-sectional area (CSA), and blood volume flow (BVF) in both IJV and vertebral veins (VV) occurred in the supine and upright body position. RESULTS: MRV identified 1 AV narrowing. IJV analysis yielded 12 patients for group 1 (30%), 19 patients for group 2 (48%), and 9 patients for group 3 (22%). By ECCS criteria, 4 patients (10%) presented with venous drainage abnormalities. Jugular BVF was different only between groups 1 and 3 (616 ± 133 vs. 381 ± 213 mL/min, p = 0.02). No other parameters in supine position and none of the parameters in the upright body position, apart from the IJV-BVF decrease in groups 1 and 3 (479 ± 172 vs. 231 ± 144 mL/min, p = 0.01), were different. CONCLUSIONS: Our ECCS data contradict the postulated 100% prevalence of CCSVI criteria in MS. MRV seems more sensitive to detect IJV narrowing compared to ECCS. A measurable hemodynamic effect only exists in vessel narrowings >80%. Our combined data argue against a causal relationship of venous narrowing and MS, favoring the rejection of the CCSVI hypothesis.
BACKGROUND:Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) was proposed as the causal trigger for developing multiple sclerosis (MS). However, current data are contradictory and a gold standard for venous flow assessment is missing. OBJECTIVE: To compare structural magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and dynamic extracranial color-coded duplex sonography (ECCS) in a cohort of patients with MS. METHODS: We enrolled 40 patients (44 ± 10 years). All underwent contrast-enhanced MRV for assessment of internal jugular vein (IJV) and azygos vein (AV) narrowing, graded into 3 groups: 0%-50%, 51%-80%, and >80%. ECCS analysis of blood flow direction, cross-sectional area (CSA), and blood volume flow (BVF) in both IJV and vertebral veins (VV) occurred in the supine and upright body position. RESULTS: MRV identified 1 AV narrowing. IJV analysis yielded 12 patients for group 1 (30%), 19 patients for group 2 (48%), and 9 patients for group 3 (22%). By ECCS criteria, 4 patients (10%) presented with venous drainage abnormalities. Jugular BVF was different only between groups 1 and 3 (616 ± 133 vs. 381 ± 213 mL/min, p = 0.02). No other parameters in supine position and none of the parameters in the upright body position, apart from the IJV-BVF decrease in groups 1 and 3 (479 ± 172 vs. 231 ± 144 mL/min, p = 0.01), were different. CONCLUSIONS: Our ECCS data contradict the postulated 100% prevalence of CCSVI criteria in MS. MRV seems more sensitive to detect IJV narrowing compared to ECCS. A measurable hemodynamic effect only exists in vessel narrowings >80%. Our combined data argue against a causal relationship of venous narrowing and MS, favoring the rejection of the CCSVI hypothesis.
Authors: Claudio Baracchini; José M Valdueza; Massimo Del Sette; Galina Baltgaile; Eva Bartels; Natan M Bornstein; Juergen Klingelhoefer; Carlos Molina; Kurt Niederkorn; Mario Siebler; Matthias Sturzenegger; Bernd E Ringelstein; David Russell; Laszlo Csiba Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Sean K Sethi; David T Utriainen; Ana M Daugherty; Wei Feng; J Joseph Hewett; Naftali Raz; E Mark Haacke Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Staley A Brod; Larry A Kramer; Alan M Cohen; Andrew D Barreto; Thanh-Tung Bui; James R Jemelka; Kelly Ton; John W Lindsey; Flavia Nelson; Ponnada A Narayana; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: J Kuchling; T Sinnecker; I Bozin; J Dörr; V I Madai; J Sobesky; T Niendorf; F Paul; J Wuerfel Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: S Laughlin; C K Macgowan; J Traubici; K Chan; S Khan; D L Arnold; R A Marrie; B Banwell Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.825