INTRODUCTION: Zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP-70) has been identified as an independent prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Based on our previous studies, we have developed a combined one-tube technology with multiple internal controls to optimize ZAP-70 assessment. METHODS: Forty-eight untreated CLL cases were examined for ZAP-70 expression using a modified 7-color one-tube assay. Normal donor (ND) whole blood is stained with CD3 APC-Cy7 and CD19 APC. In a second tube, patient whole blood is stained with CD5 PE-Cy7, CD19 PerCP-Cy5.5, and CD20 eFluor450. After surface staining and fixation, these two tubes are combined. After saponin permeabilization, the cells were stained with two anti-ZAP-70 clones (1E7.2/AF488 and SBZAP/PE). The results obtained from this modified tube were compared with those obtained concurrently using the non-mixed single sample tubes. Five different methods of ZAP-70 expression analysis were evaluated: percentage positive cells using ND T-cells as a reference; the internal patient T-cell/clone ratio; ND T-cell/clone ratio; clone/ND B-cell ratio; and modified Z-index. RESULT: Overall, the combined patient and ND mix tube performed better than the non-mixed single sample tube. The strongest correlations between ZAP-70 expression and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status were seen with percentage positive ND T-cell, ND T-cell/clone ratio, and clone/ND B-cell ratio for both 1E7.2 and SBZAP clone (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified one tube method combining the ND and patient sample provides highly reliable results that correlate with the IGHV mutational status. This method should be considered as part of the next step in standardization of the ZAP-70 assay in CLL. Published 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
INTRODUCTION:Zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP-70) has been identified as an independent prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Based on our previous studies, we have developed a combined one-tube technology with multiple internal controls to optimize ZAP-70 assessment. METHODS: Forty-eight untreated CLL cases were examined for ZAP-70 expression using a modified 7-color one-tube assay. Normal donor (ND) whole blood is stained with CD3 APC-Cy7 and CD19APC. In a second tube, patient whole blood is stained with CD5PE-Cy7, CD19PerCP-Cy5.5, and CD20 eFluor450. After surface staining and fixation, these two tubes are combined. After saponin permeabilization, the cells were stained with two anti-ZAP-70 clones (1E7.2/AF488 and SBZAP/PE). The results obtained from this modified tube were compared with those obtained concurrently using the non-mixed single sample tubes. Five different methods of ZAP-70 expression analysis were evaluated: percentage positive cells using ND T-cells as a reference; the internal patient T-cell/clone ratio; ND T-cell/clone ratio; clone/ND B-cell ratio; and modified Z-index. RESULT: Overall, the combined patient and ND mix tube performed better than the non-mixed single sample tube. The strongest correlations between ZAP-70 expression and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status were seen with percentage positive ND T-cell, ND T-cell/clone ratio, and clone/ND B-cell ratio for both 1E7.2 and SBZAP clone (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The modified one tube method combining the ND and patient sample provides highly reliable results that correlate with the IGHV mutational status. This method should be considered as part of the next step in standardization of the ZAP-70 assay in CLL. Published 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Laura Z Rassenti; Lang Huynh; Tracy L Toy; Liguang Chen; Michael J Keating; John G Gribben; Donna S Neuberg; Ian W Flinn; Kanti R Rai; John C Byrd; Neil E Kay; Andrew Greaves; Arthur Weiss; Thomas J Kipps Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T Vincent Shankey; Meryl Forman; Paul Scibelli; Jeffrey Cobb; Cecilia M Smith; Rhonda Mills; Karen Holdaway; Elizabeth Bernal-Hoyos; Mafalda Van Der Heiden; Jan Popma; Mike Keeney Journal: Cytometry B Clin Cytom Date: 2006-07-15 Impact factor: 3.058
Authors: Francesca M Rossi; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Davide Rossi; Maria Irno Consalvo; Fabrizio Luciano; Antonella Zucchetto; Pietro Bulian; Riccardo Bomben; Michele Dal Bo; Marco Fangazio; Dania Benedetti; Massimo Degan; Gianluca Gaidano; Giovanni Del Poeta; Valter Gattei Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Andreas Rosenwald; Eric Y Chuang; R Eric Davis; Adrian Wiestner; Ash A Alizadeh; Diane C Arthur; James B Mitchell; Gerald E Marti; Daniel H Fowler; Wyndham H Wilson; Louis M Staudt Journal: Blood Date: 2004-05-11 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michael Hallek; Bruce D Cheson; Daniel Catovsky; Federico Caligaris-Cappio; Guillaume Dighiero; Hartmut Döhner; Peter Hillmen; Michael J Keating; Emili Montserrat; Kanti R Rai; Thomas J Kipps Journal: Blood Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 22.113