OBJECTIVE: Prevalence of binge eating has been shown to be as common in men as in women, yet few studies have included men. Men are especially underrepresented in treatment studies, raising the question of whether men who binge eat experience less distress or impairment than women. This study compared demographic and clinical correlates of binge eating in a large employee sample of men and women. METHOD: Cross-sectional data from 21,743 men and 24,608 women who participated in a health risk self assessment screening were used. Group differences in obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Type 2 diabetes, depression, stress, sleep, sick days, work impairment, and nonwork activity impairment were tested using chi-square tests (categorical variables) and independent sample t-tests (continuous variables). RESULTS: Effect size estimates indicate that men (n = 1,630) and women (n = 2,754) who binge eat experience comparable levels of clinical impairment. They also report substantially greater impairment when compared with men and women who do not binge eat. DISCUSSION: The underrepresentation of men in treatment-seeking samples does not appear to reflect lower levels of impairment in men versus women. Efforts are needed to raise awareness of the clinical significance of binge eating in men so that this group can receive appropriate screening and treatment services.
OBJECTIVE: Prevalence of binge eating has been shown to be as common in men as in women, yet few studies have included men. Men are especially underrepresented in treatment studies, raising the question of whether men who binge eat experience less distress or impairment than women. This study compared demographic and clinical correlates of binge eating in a large employee sample of men and women. METHOD: Cross-sectional data from 21,743 men and 24,608 women who participated in a health risk self assessment screening were used. Group differences in obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Type 2 diabetes, depression, stress, sleep, sick days, work impairment, and nonwork activity impairment were tested using chi-square tests (categorical variables) and independent sample t-tests (continuous variables). RESULTS: Effect size estimates indicate that men (n = 1,630) and women (n = 2,754) who binge eat experience comparable levels of clinical impairment. They also report substantially greater impairment when compared with men and women who do not binge eat. DISCUSSION: The underrepresentation of men in treatment-seeking samples does not appear to reflect lower levels of impairment in men versus women. Efforts are needed to raise awareness of the clinical significance of binge eating in men so that this group can receive appropriate screening and treatment services.
Authors: Marcantonio M Spada; Gabriele Caselli; Bruce A Fernie; Ana V Nikčević; Giovanni M Ruggiero; Fabio Boccaletti; Giulia Dallari; Sandra Sassaroli Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2015-07-05 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia A Berglund; Wai Tat Chiu; Anne C Deitz; James I Hudson; Victoria Shahly; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Jordi Alonso; Matthias C Angermeyer; Corina Benjet; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Josep Maria Haro; Viviane Kovess-Masfety; Siobhan O'Neill; Jose Posada-Villa; Carmen Sasu; Kate Scott; Maria Carmen Viana; Miguel Xavier Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Cynthia M Bulik; Marsha D Marcus; Ruth H Striegel; Denise E Wilfley; Stephen A Wonderlich; James I Hudson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Tomoko Udo; Sherry A McKee; Marney A White; Robin M Masheb; Rachel D Barnes; Carlos M Grilo Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 3.238