| Literature DB >> 22031210 |
Silvia Regina Shiwa1, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Luciola da Cunha Menezes Costa, Anne Moseley, Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior, Roberta Venâncio, Cintia Ruggero, Tatiana de Oliveira Sato, Alexandre Dias Lopes.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to test the inter-rater reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro Scale. Seven physiotherapists rated the methodological quality of 50 reports of randomized controlled trials written in Portuguese indexed on the PEDro database. Each report was also rated using the English version of the PEDro Scale. Reproducibility was evaluated by comparing two separate ratings of reports written in Portuguese and comparing the Portuguese PEDro score with the English version of the scale. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 1.00 for individual item and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.82 for the total PEDro score was observed. The standard error of the measurement of the scale was 0.58. The Portuguese version of the scale was comparable with the English version, with an ICC of 0.78. The inter-rater reproducibility of the Brazilian Portuguese PEDro Scale is adequate and similar to the original English version.Mesh：
Year: 2011 PMID： 22031210 DOI： 10.1590/s0102-311x2011001000019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cad Saude Publica ISSN： 0102-311X Impact factor: 1.632