Literature DB >> 22030621

Chk2 deficiency in Myc overexpressing lymphoma cells elicits a synergistic lethal response in combination with PARP inhibition.

Andreas Höglund1, Kerstin Strömvall, Yongmei Li, Linus Plym Forshell, Jonas A Nilsson.   

Abstract

Myc is a transcription factor frequently found deregulated in human cancer. The Myc-mediated cellular transformation process is associated with fast proliferative cells and inherent genomic instability, giving rise to malignant, invasive neoplasms with poor prognosis for survival. Transcription-independent functions of Myc include stimulation of replication. Excessive Myc expression stimulates a replication-associated DNA damage response that signals via the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K)-related protein kinases (PIKKs) ATM and ATR. These, in turn, activate the DNA damage transducers Chk1 and Chk2. Here, we show that Myc can stimulate Chek2 transcript indirectly in vitro as well as in B cells of λ-Myc transgenic mice or in the intestine of Apc (Min) mice. However, Chk2 is dispensable for Myc's ability to transform cells in vitro and for the survival of established lymphoma cells from λ-Myc transgenic mice. Chk2 deficiency induces polyploidy and slow growth, but the cells are viable and protected against DNA damage. Furthermore, inhibition of both Chk1/Chk2 with AZD7762 induces cell death and significantly delays disease progression of transplanted lymphoma cells in vivo. DNA damage recruits PARP family members to sites of DNA breaks that, in turn, facilitate the induction of DNA repair. Strikingly, combining Chk2 and PARP inhibition elicits a synergistic lethal response in the context of Myc overexpression. Our data indicates that only certain types of chemotherapy would give rise to a synergistic lethal response in combination with specific Chk2 inhibitors, which will be important if Chk2 inhibitors enter the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030621      PMCID: PMC3266184          DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.20.17887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  62 in total

1.  DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2.

Authors:  A Hirao; Y Y Kong; S Matsuoka; A Wakeham; J Ruland; H Yoshida; D Liu; S J Elledge; T W Mak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Phosphorylation of threonine 68 promotes oligomerization and autophosphorylation of the Chk2 protein kinase via the forkhead-associated domain.

Authors:  Joon-Young Ahn; Xianghong Li; Heather L Davis; Christine E Canman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  D W Bell; J M Varley; T E Szydlo; D H Kang; D C Wahrer; K E Shannon; M Lubratovich; S J Verselis; K J Isselbacher; J F Fraumeni; J M Birch; F P Li; J E Garber; D A Haber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Antisense inhibition of Chk2/hCds1 expression attenuates DNA damage-induced S and G2 checkpoints and enhances apoptotic activity in HEK-293 cells.

Authors:  Q Yu; J H Rose; H Zhang; Y Pommier
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 4.124

5.  Somatic mutations in the DNA damage-response genes ATR and CHK1 in sporadic stomach tumors with microsatellite instability.

Authors:  A Menoyo; H Alazzouzi; E Espín; M Armengol; H Yamamoto; S Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis.

Authors:  J Falck; N Mailand; R G Syljuåsen; J Bartek; J Lukas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  S Matsuoka; G Rotman; A Ogawa; Y Shiloh; K Tamai; S J Elledge
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Aberrant cell cycle checkpoint function and early embryonic death in Chk1(-/-) mice.

Authors:  H Takai; K Tominaga; N Motoyama; Y A Minamishima; H Nagahama; T Tsukiyama; K Ikeda; K Nakayama; M Nakanishi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Q Liu; S Guntuku; X S Cui; S Matsuoka; D Cortez; K Tamai; G Luo; S Carattini-Rivera; F DeMayo; A Bradley; L A Donehower; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  The direct Myc target Pim3 cooperates with other Pim kinases in supporting viability of Myc-induced B-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Linus Plym Forshell; Yongmei Li; Tacha Zi Plym Forshell; Martina Rudelius; Lisa Nilsson; Ulrich Keller; Jonas Nilsson
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2011-06
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target.

Authors:  Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  PARP inhibitors: shifting the paradigm in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Devashish Desai; Pushti Khandwala; Meghana Parsi; Rashmika Potdar
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Evaluation of candidate biomarkers to predict cancer cell sensitivity or resistance to PARP-1 inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  Lenka Oplustilova; Kamila Wolanin; Martin Mistrik; Gabriela Korinkova; Dana Simkova; Jan Bouchal; Rene Lenobel; Jirina Bartkova; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  BET bromodomain inhibitors synergize with ATR inhibitors to induce DNA damage, apoptosis, senescence-associated secretory pathway and ER stress in Myc-induced lymphoma cells.

Authors:  S V Muralidharan; J Bhadury; L M Nilsson; L C Green; K G McLure; J A Nilsson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 5.  c-MYC-induced genomic instability.

Authors:  Alexandra Kuzyk; Sabine Mai
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  Two sides of the Myc-induced DNA damage response: from tumor suppression to tumor maintenance.

Authors:  Stefano Campaner; Bruno Amati
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.130

7.  MYC is a critical target of FBXW7.

Authors:  Mai Sato; Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Jiyang Yu; Catherine Do; Jose M Silva; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-02-20

8.  PARP inhibition sensitizes to low dose-rate radiation TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene-expressing and PTEN-deficient prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Payel Chatterjee; Gaurav S Choudhary; Arishya Sharma; Kamini Singh; Warren D Heston; Jay Ciezki; Eric A Klein; Alexandru Almasan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR cascade inhibitors: how mutations can result in therapy resistance and how to overcome resistance.

Authors:  James A McCubrey; Linda S Steelman; William H Chappell; Stephen L Abrams; Richard A Franklin; Giuseppe Montalto; Melchiorre Cervello; Massimo Libra; Saverio Candido; Grazia Malaponte; Maria C Mazzarino; Paolo Fagone; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Jörg Bäsecke; Sanja Mijatovic; Danijela Maksimovic-Ivanic; Michele Milella; Agostino Tafuri; Francesca Chiarini; Camilla Evangelisti; Lucio Cocco; Alberto M Martelli
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2012-10

10.  Inactivation of SMC2 shows a synergistic lethal response in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  Yuko Murakami-Tonami; Satoshi Kishida; Ichiro Takeuchi; Yuki Katou; John M Maris; Hitoshi Ichikawa; Yutaka Kondo; Yoshitaka Sekido; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Hiroshi Murakami; Kenji Kadomatsu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.