Literature DB >> 22030566

Clinical and pathological discrepancies and cardiovascular findings in 409 consecutive autopsies.

Aline Fusco Fares1, Jorge Fares, Gislaine Fusco Fares, José Antônio Cordeiro, Marcelo Arruda Nakazone, Patrícia Maluf Cury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses persists worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated autopsies in a university hospital in order to assess the accuracy of clinical cardiovascular diagnosis compared to postmortem findings.
METHODS: Four hundred nine consecutive autopsies between 2003 and 2006 were analyzed in a tertiary-care hospital in São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. The comparison of clinic-pathological cardiovascular findings was performed using Goldman's discrepancies classification.
RESULTS: Autopsy rate at the hospital was 8%. Cardiovascular causes of death represented 42.8% (175 out of 409 patients) of autopsy diagnoses. In 98 (56%) patients, there were major discrepancies (class I and II), representing a large proportion of misdiagnoses for mesenteric infarction (84.6%), acute myocardial infarction (64.7%), aorta dissection (64.2%), and pulmonary embolism (62.5%). Highest concordance rates were observed in congestive heart failure (59%) and acute ischemic stroke (58.8%). Age, sex, length of stay and the last admission unit at the hospital were not associated with Goldman criteria.
CONCLUSION: Clinic-autopsy discrepancies concerning cardiovascular death remain high in Brazil, despite technological resources available. Moreover, our findings reinforce the importance of postmortem examination in contributing to medical care improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030566     DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2011005000111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol        ISSN: 0066-782X            Impact factor:   2.000


  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of the discrepancy between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and anatomopathological diagnoses resulting from autopsies.

Authors:  Talita Zerbini; Julio M Singer; Vilma Leyton
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  The Value Proposition for Pathologists: A Population Health Approach.

Authors:  Barbara S Ducatman; Alan M Ducatman; James M Crawford; Michael Laposata; Fred Sanfilippo
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-01-14

3.  Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Stefan Rusu; Philomène Lavis; Vilma Domingues Salgado; Marie-Paule Van Craynest; Jacques Creteur; Isabelle Salmon; Alexandre Brasseur; Myriam Remmelink
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 4.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.