BACKGROUND: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC staging system applies to all soft-tissue sarcomas and does not allow for consideration of many features unique to retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs). The aim of this study was to analyze factors predictive of recurrence and survival for patients with resected RPSs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with primary RPS who underwent resection. A 3-tiered histological classification was examined: atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs), non-ALT liposarcomas (LPSs), and other. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among groups. RESULTS: Sixty RPS patients were analyzed: 16 patients (27%) had ALTs, 7 patients (12%) had LPSs, and 37 patients (62%) had other histologies. A comparison of the 3 groups showed a significant difference in OS among groups (P < .017). High-grade tumors favored shorter DFS (P = .06) but were not associated with decreased OS when compared with low-grade tumors (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an alternative staging system for RPS, inclusive of histology, which may prove useful in operative planning and prognostication.
BACKGROUND: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC staging system applies to all soft-tissue sarcomas and does not allow for consideration of many features unique to retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs). The aim of this study was to analyze factors predictive of recurrence and survival for patients with resected RPSs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with primary RPS who underwent resection. A 3-tiered histological classification was examined: atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs), non-ALT liposarcomas (LPSs), and other. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among groups. RESULTS: Sixty RPS patients were analyzed: 16 patients (27%) had ALTs, 7 patients (12%) had LPSs, and 37 patients (62%) had other histologies. A comparison of the 3 groups showed a significant difference in OS among groups (P < .017). High-grade tumors favored shorter DFS (P = .06) but were not associated with decreased OS when compared with low-grade tumors (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an alternative staging system for RPS, inclusive of histology, which may prove useful in operative planning and prognostication.
Authors: Marcus C B Tan; Murray F Brennan; Deborah Kuk; Narasimhan P Agaram; Cristina R Antonescu; Li-Xuan Qin; Nicole Moraco; Aimee M Crago; Samuel Singer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 12.969