| Literature DB >> 22029879 |
Sayyed A Hamidi1, Richard Z Lin, Anthony M Szema, Sergey Lyubsky, Ya Ping Jiang, Sami I Said.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) remains a therapeutic challenge, and the search continues for more effective drugs and drug combinations. We recently reported that deletion of the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) gene caused the spontaneous expression of a PH phenotype that was fully corrected by VIP. The objectives of this investigation were to answer the questions: 1) Can VIP protect against PH in other experimental models? and 2) Does combining VIP with an endothelin (ET) receptor antagonist bosentan enhance its efficacy?Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22029879 PMCID: PMC3210095 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-141
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
The PAH Phenotype in MCT-Injected Rats: Near-Full Prevention by Early Treatment with VIP *
| Measurements | Control, untreated | MCT + | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | VIP | † | ** | †† | ||
| RV systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 24.3 ± 2.4 | 61.4 ± 4.8 | 29.9 ± 1.8 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | NS |
| Arteriolar medial/luminal area | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 3.9 ± 0.51 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | NS |
| RV/(LV+septum) weight ratio | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | NS |
| Lung inflammation (0-4) | 0.20 ± 0.17 | 3.0 ± 0.26 | 0.3 ± 0.21 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | NS |
* VIP treatment was begun on the same day as MCT. ANOVA: p < 0.0001
† MCT alone vs. control; ** VIP pretreatment vs. MCT alone; †† VIP pretreatment vs. control.
Reversal of MCT-Induced PAH by VIP, Bosentan, or Their Combination
| Measurements | Control, untreated | MCT + | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | VIP | Bosentan | VIP + Bosentan | * | † | ** | ||
| RV systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 24.3 ± 2.4 | 61.4 ± 4.8 | 33 ± 0.5 | 39 ± 1.2 | 26.0 ± 1.2 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
| Arteriolar medial/luminal area | 0.76 ± 0.07 | 3.9 ± 0.51 | 1.68 ± 0.19 | 1.76 ± 0.19 | 0.79 ± 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
| RV/(LV+septum) weight ratio | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | < 0.05 | ||
| Lung inflammation (0-4) | 0.20 ± 0.17 | 3.0 ± 0.26 | 0.3 ± 0.21 | 1.2 ± 0.28 | 0.3 ± 0.33 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 | < 0.05 |
Therapy with either drug, or both together, was begun 3 weeks following MCT, i.e., after PH had fully developed. ANOVA: p < 0.0001
* MCT + VIP vs. MCT; † MCT + Bosentan vs. MCT; ** MCT + VIP + bosentan vs. MCT