| Literature DB >> 22029620 |
Miguel Roehrs1, Juliana Valentini, Clóvis Paniz, Angela Moro, Mariele Charão, Rachel Bulcão, Fernando Freitas, Natália Brucker, Marta Duarte, Mirna Leal, Geni Burg, Tilman Grune, Solange Cristina Garcia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate the relationships among the plasma levels of carotenoids, tocopherols, endogenous antioxidants, oxidative damage and lipid profiles and their possible effects on the cardiovascular risk associated with hemodialysis (HD) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22029620 PMCID: PMC3213013 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2369-12-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Regression analysis realized to lipid peroxidation, lipid profile and antioxidants.
| LDL-c (R2) of model: 0.14 | HDL-c (R2) of model: 0.67 | MDA (R2) of model: | TC/HDL (R2) of model: 0.53 | LDL/HDL (R2) of model: 0.60 | TG (R2) of model: 0.51 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ns | 0.75 | ns | 0.11 | ns | 0.10 | ns | 0.08 | ns | 0.33 | ns | 0.35 | |
| ns | 0.66 | ns | 0.11 | ns | 0.08 | 1.05 | 0.04 | ns | 0.10 | 17.82 | 0.03 | |
| ne | - | ns | 0.69 | ns | 0.45 | ne | - | ns | 0.92 | ns | 0.29 | |
| ne | - | ns | 0.48 | ns | 0.62 | ns | 0.70 | ns | 0.80 | ns | 0.64 | |
| ne | - | 3.39 | 0.003 | - 0.33 | 0.02 | - 0.54 | 0.03 | - 0.55 | 0.001 | - 10.16 | 0.004 | |
| ns | - | ns | 0.66 | ns | 0.48 | ns | 0.48 | ns | 0.89 | ns | 0.38 | |
| - 31.59 | 0.044 | ns | 0.23 | ns | 0.75 | ns | 0.52 | ns | 0.20 | ns | 0.96 | |
| ns | 0.67 | ns | 0.60 | ns | 0.82 | ns | 0.51 | ns | 0.47 | ns | 0.63 | |
ns: non significant.
ne: non entered in this regression model.
Hematological and biochemical analysis.
| Parameters | Healthy Subjects (n = 20) | Hemodialysis Patients (n = 29) | Reference Values57 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 10) | Women (n = 10) | Men (n = 19) | Women (n = 10) | Men | Women | |
| 14.90 ± 0.50 | 9.92 ± 0.29a, c | |||||
| 16.5 ± 0.4 | 12.8 ± 0.1 | 10.0 ± 0.4c | 9.7 ± 0.5c | 12 - 18 | 11 - 16 | |
| 43.20 ± 1.20 | 30.54 ± 4.73 a, c | |||||
| 46.9 ± 0.8 | 38.0 ± 0.8 | 30.8 ± 1.2 c | 29.8 ± 1.4c | 39 - 53 | 35 - 47 | |
| 3.98 ± 0.06 | 3.15 ± 0.03 a, c | 3.4 - 5.0 | ||||
| 4.02 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.05 | 3.2 ± 0.03 c | 3.1 ± 0.05 c | |||
| 0.68 ± 0.07 | 10.17 ± 0.62 a, b | 0.8 - 1.3 | ||||
| 0.89 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.03 | 11.5 ± 0.08 | 8.40 ± 0.83 | |||
| 27.40 ± 1.60 | 164.55 ± 7.46 a, b | 15 - 39 | ||||
| 28.96 ± 2.55 | 25.29 ± 1.36 | 171.10 ± 10.10 | 160.21 ± 11.73 | |||
The values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
a p < 0.05 when compared with healthy subjects; b Inter gender difference (p < 0.05); c Below to reference value.
Lipid profile results of studied groups and reference values.
| Parameters | Healthy Subjects (n = 20) | Hemodialysis Patients (n = 29) | Reference Values57 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 10) | Women (n = 10) | Men (n = 19) | Women (n = 10) | Men | Women | |
| 147.27 ± 4.48 | 181.14 ± 5.38a | < 200 | ||||
| 145.9 ± 7.9 | 148.9 ± 4.1 | 178.2 ± 6.2 | 182.7 ± 10.3 | |||
| 72.66 ± 4.37 | 115.89 ± 3.79a | < 130 | ||||
| 69.4 ± 6.5 | 76.9 ± 5.6 | 117.5 ± 4.5 | 111.5 ± 7.0 | |||
| 55.90 ± 3.00 | 28.89 ± 1.92a | |||||
| 53.0 ± 3.9 | 61.0 ± 3.9 | 29.2 ± 2.9 | 28.7 ± 2.4 | > 40 | > 45 | |
| 90.70 ± 6.40 | 160.37 ± 9.28a | < 150 | ||||
| 90.7 ± 6.3 | 85.4 ± 11.0 | 175.4 ± 11.9 | 131.9 ± 11.7 b | |||
| 1.28 ± 0.11 | 4.48 ± 0.32a | < 3.55 | ||||
| 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | |||
| 2.68 ± 0.15 | 7.12 ± 0.55a | < 5 | ||||
| 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.9 | 6.8 ± 0.6 b | |||
The values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
a p < 0.05 when compared with healthy subjects; b Inter gender difference (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: TC: cholesterol total; LDL-c: LDL cholesterol; HDL-c: HDL cholesterol; TG: triglycerides.
Results of studied groups: antioxidants and lipid peroxidation biomarker.
| Biomarkers | Healthy Subjects (n = 20) | Hemodialysis Patients (n = 29) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 10) | Women (n = 10) | Men (n = 19) | Women (n = 10) | |
| 6.03 ± 0.26 | 7.87 ± 0.27a | |||
| 5.6 ± 0.2 | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 7.9 ± 0.4 | |
| 27.96 ± 4.18 | 56.99 ± 4.25a | |||
| 26.6 ± 6.9 | 29.3 ± 5.2 | 55.5 ± 5.5 | 61.1 ± 7.5 | |
| 11.57 ± 0.39 | 6.61 ± 0.21a | |||
| 12.2 ± 0.5 | 11.0 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | |
| 0.69 ± 0.49 | 0.91 ± 0.03a | |||
| 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.8 ± 0.07 | 0.9 ± 0.05 | 0.9 ± 0.05 | |
| 4.53 ± 0.16 | 6.92 ± 0.36a | |||
| 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.6 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | |
The values represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
a p < 0.05 when compared with healthy subjects.
Abbreviations: GSH: reduced glutathione; CAT: catalase activity; GPX: glutathione peroxidase activity;
SOD: superoxide dismutase activity; MDA: malondialdehyde.
Results of vitamin levels analyzed in plasma of subjects studied.
| Vitamins | Healthy Subjects (n = 20) | Hemodialysis Patients (n = 29) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 10) | Women (n = 10) | Men (n = 19) | Women (n = 10) | |
| 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | |||
| 0.5 ± 0.05 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.08 | 0.5 ± 0.05 | |
| 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | |||
| 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.07 ± 0.005 | |
| 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | |||
| 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.09 | |
| 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.01a | |||
| 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.05 b | 0.07 ± 0.008 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.64 ± 0.09 | 0.50 ± 0.07 | |||
| 0.4 ± 0.05 | 0.9 ± 0.1b | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.7 ± 0.2 b | |
| 0.64 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.05a | |||
| 0.6 ± 0.06 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.06 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | |
| 29.6 ± 1.3 | 33.2 ± 1.9 | |||
| 29.8 ± 2.0 | 29.4 ± 1.8 | 29.4 ± 1.7 | 41 ± 3.4 b | |
The values represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
The unit for all parameters is μmol.L-1.
a p < 0.05 when compared with healthy subjects.
b Inter-gender difference (p < 0.05).