Literature DB >> 22029534

Exploring the care experience of patients undergoing spinal surgery: a qualitative study.

Rachel E Davis1, Charles Vincent, Ania Henley, Alison McGregor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This exploratory study sought to explore the patient experience of the surgical journey from decision to operate, to hospitalization, discharge and subsequent recovery.
DESIGN: Patients attended one of two focus group discussions. PATIENT SAMPLE: Seven patients that had undergone surgery for spinal stenosis or disc prolapsed participated, aged between 48-75 years (mean age 59); five were male.
METHODS: Patients' attitudes towards the information and care they received from the point of the decision to operate through to post-operative recovery were explored. Particular attention was paid to patients' information needs, support provided, general understanding of the processes and ways in which care could have been improved.
RESULTS: Patients identified nine main 'needs' they felt played an integral part in enhancing the patient experience including the need for reduced waiting times, for better information and preparation, to be proactive, to speak up and ask questions, to feel safe and to be treated with dignity and respect; and the need for ongoing support, human contact, and; continuity of care.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that there are several measures that could be taken to improve the patient's surgical experience. In particular, providing appropriate information to patients in a timely manner and ensuring that support and advice is easily accessible for those patients that need it are key areas for improvement.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22029534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01783.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  6 in total

1.  Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sabine Fischbeck; Katja Petrowski; Mirjam Renovanz; Rebecca Nesbigall; Julian Haaf; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Waiting for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: suffering and a possibility to discover coping abilities.

Authors:  Björn Knutsson; Mats Jong; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén; Marika Augutis
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Dignity as an empirical lifeworld construction-in the field of surgery in Denmark.

Authors:  Tina Seidelin Rasmussen; Charlotte Delmar
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2014-07-17

4.  Consumer Perception of Inpatient Medical Services.

Authors:  Satoko Izugami; Kozo Takase
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Patient journey following lumbar discectomy surgery: protocol for a single-centre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (DiscJourn).

Authors:  Louise White; Nicola R Heneghan; Navin Furtado; Annabel Masson; Alison B Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Early Cervical Spine Stabilizer Training and Usual Care in Individuals following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Carol McFarland; Sharon Wang-Price; Charles R Gordon; Guy Otis Danielson; J Stuart Crutchfield; Ann Medley; Toni Roddey
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2020-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.