Literature DB >> 22029245

Comparison of communication outcomes in traditional versus simulation strategies in nursing and medical students.

Deanna L Reising1, Douglas E Carr, Roberta A Shea, Jason M King.   

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine has called for more interprofessional collaboration between physicians and nurses. The purpose of this research was to compare the outcomes in affective and communication domains using a traditional (roundtable) model versus simulation in nursing and medical students. A prospective, descriptive survey design was used to collect data on 41 senior bachelor of science in nursing students, and 19 second-year medical students. The simulation strategy resulted in statistically higher levels of stress as identified by participants. In addition, nearly all participants reported having a better sense of the clinical role, and with 55 percent of participants stating that the experience changed their view of the role of the clinical team. This initial study indicates that interprofessional communication may be enhanced using simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22029245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect        ISSN: 1536-5026


  4 in total

1.  Interprofessional education among student health professionals using human patient simulation.

Authors:  Scott Bolesta; Joyce V Chmil
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Using Medical Mannequins to Train Nurses in Stroke Swallowing Screening.

Authors:  Tonya R Freeland; Shweta Pathak; Racquell R Garrett; Jane A Anderson; Stephanie K Daniels
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Use of high-fidelity simulation to teach end-of-life care to pharmacy students in an interdisciplinary course.

Authors:  Irene Gilliland; Bradi L Frei; Jeanette McNeill; Jacqueline Stovall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Interprofessional communication (IPC) for medical students: a scoping review.

Authors:  Chermaine Bok; Cheng Han Ng; Jeffery Wei Heng Koh; Zhi Hao Ong; Haziratul Zakirah Binte Ghazali; Lorraine Hui En Tan; Yun Ting Ong; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Stephen Mason; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.