BACKGROUND: Rapid and reliable exclusion of acute myocardial infarction during emergency department triage is an important clinical need. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential role of copeptin, a marker of acute endogenous stress, together with high sensitive troponin-I for a rapid and early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Copeptin and myoglobin were measured in 80 subjects presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction, 46 patients had a negative high sensitive troponin-I concentration at presentation, 3, 6 and 12 hours; whereas 34 patients had negative or very low high sensitive troponin-I at presentation, but rising troponin values at 3, 6 and 12 hours. RESULTS: Copeptin was significantly higher in patients with evidence of myocardial damage (median 92.2 pmol/L vs 8.5 pmol/L, p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for copeptin at initial presentation was 0.86 (95 % confidence interval, CI: 0.76 to 0.93), which was significantly higher than 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.78, p < 0.05) for myoglobin but not significantly different from 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.93) for high sensitive troponin-I. The combination of high sensitive troponin-I and copeptin resulted in an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98), while the combination of high sensitive troponin-I and myoglobin results in an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Copeptin concentrations are more sensitive than myoglobin as an early marker of myocardial damage. Although copeptin provides significant incremental value on top of high sensitivity troponin-I, myoglobin does not.
BACKGROUND: Rapid and reliable exclusion of acute myocardial infarction during emergency department triage is an important clinical need. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential role of copeptin, a marker of acute endogenous stress, together with high sensitive troponin-I for a rapid and early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS:Copeptin and myoglobin were measured in 80 subjects presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction, 46 patients had a negative high sensitive troponin-I concentration at presentation, 3, 6 and 12 hours; whereas 34 patients had negative or very low high sensitive troponin-I at presentation, but rising troponin values at 3, 6 and 12 hours. RESULTS:Copeptin was significantly higher in patients with evidence of myocardial damage (median 92.2 pmol/L vs 8.5 pmol/L, p < 0.0001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for copeptin at initial presentation was 0.86 (95 % confidence interval, CI: 0.76 to 0.93), which was significantly higher than 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.78, p < 0.05) for myoglobin but not significantly different from 0.88 (95% CI: 0.79 to 0.93) for high sensitive troponin-I. The combination of high sensitive troponin-I and copeptin resulted in an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98), while the combination of high sensitive troponin-I and myoglobin results in an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS:Copeptin concentrations are more sensitive than myoglobin as an early marker of myocardial damage. Although copeptin provides significant incremental value on top of high sensitivity troponin-I, myoglobin does not.
Authors: Jasper Boeddinghaus; Tobias Reichlin; Thomas Nestelberger; Raphael Twerenbold; Yvette Meili; Karin Wildi; Petra Hillinger; Maria Rubini Giménez; Janosch Cupa; Lukas Schumacher; Marie Schubera; Patrick Badertscher; Sydney Corbière; Karin Grimm; Christian Puelacher; Zaid Sabti; Dayana Flores Widmer; Nicolas Schaerli; Nikola Kozhuharov; Samyut Shrestha; Tobias Bürge; Patrick Mächler; Michael Büchi; Katharina Rentsch; Òscar Miró; Beatriz López; F Javier Martin-Sanchez; Esther Rodriguez-Adrada; Beata Morawiec; Damian Kawecki; Eva Ganovská; Jiri Parenica; Jens Lohrmann; Andreas Buser; Dagmar I Keller; Stefan Osswald; Christian Mueller Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: M Kankra; A Mehta; J P S Sawhney; S Solanki; S Bhargava; A Ahirwar; A Manocha; P Singla; A Sharma; M Sharma Journal: Indian J Clin Biochem Date: 2022-01-08
Authors: Jes-Niels Boeckel; Jana Oppermann; Remzi Anadol; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Andreas M Zeiher; Till Keller Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 4.379