| Literature DB >> 22028970 |
Abstract
High- and low-angle X-ray diffraction studies of hard α-keratin have been studied, and various models have been proposed over the last 70 years. Most of these studies have been confined to one or two forms of alpha keratin. This high- and low-angle synchrotron fibre diffraction study extends the study to cover all available data for all known forms of hard α-keratin including hairs, fingernails, hooves, horn, and quills from mammals, marsupials, and a monotreme, and it confirms that the model proposed is universally acceptable for all mammals. A complete Bragg analysis of the meridional diffraction patterns, including multiple-time exposures to verify any weak reflections, verified the existence of a superlattice consisting of two infinite lattices and three finite lattices. An analysis of the equatorial patterns establishes the radii of the oligomeric levels of dimers, tetramers, and intermediate filaments (IFs) together with the centre to centre distance for the IFs, thus confirming the proposed helices within helices molecular architecture for hard α-keratin. The results verify that the structure proposed by Feughelman and James meets the criteria for a valid α-keratin structure.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22028970 PMCID: PMC3199101 DOI: 10.1155/2011/198325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Res Int
Figure 1(a) This figure shows the winding together of two hetero keratin fibrils to form a dimer. (b) This figure shows the winding together of two dimers in a Crick “knob in hole” packing. (c) This figure depicts the lattices that superimpose on the diffraction pattern resulting in the superlattice that is the resultant of the superposition of the seven lattices discussed below. The 47 nm lattice is associated with the distance between the beginning of the helical section of one tetramer and the beginning of the helical section of the next but one tetramer, for example, AB, BD, thus creating an obvious infinite and continuous lattice in the direction of the hair. The finite lattices (19.8 nm, 272 nm, and 12.4 nm), recorded by Wilk et al. [6], James et al. [7], Feughelman et al. [12], and James [11] are subsets of the projections of the 47 nm lattice being the projection of the 200 nm section of the helical section [15] plus and minus the nonhelical section [8, 11, 12]. All reflections from the two other lattices 7.8 nm and 15.6 nm representing the C and N terminal noncoiled ends and their sum [15] are buried under reflections of the other lattices. The repeat distance of 62.6 nm is the projection on the direction of the fibre of the complete tetramers, that is, the projection of the sum of the lengths of the helical and nonhelical sections of the tetramer, for example, AC, as it winds through 120°. Considering a line entering at A and leaving at C, the presence of an infinite lattice with spacing 62.6 nm is not so obvious. As the geometrical analysis shows [10] it is mathematically possible for one and only one condition, namely, that the distance between the IFs is three-times the radius of the IF. This is illustrated in Figure 2 where A, B, C, D, and E are successive points along the lattice. They are separated by ~63.1 nm which projects onto the direction of the hair as 62.6 nm. The insert is a view vertically downwards showing a sequence of lattice points of this infinite lattice traversing through the hexagonal array as it progress along the hair. (d) This figure shows the progress of the infinite 62.6 nm lattice as it progresses the length of the hexagonal array of intermediate filaments (IFs) in the sample. The unique hexagonal geometrical arrangement of the IFs, namely, that the centre to centre spacing of adjacent IFs is three-times the radius of the IF, and the fact that there is 60° between the linkage points on adjacent tetramers, give rise to an infinite repeating lattice, one set of points being A, B, C, D, E, and so forth, that has a projected spacing of 62.6 nm in the direction of the hair. The vertical view shows the sideways progression across the hexagonal array of successive points on the lattice as it moves along the length of the sample. Each point is separated along the length of the hair by 62.6 nm from its neighbours.
Figure 2(a) Typical diffraction patterns obtained from small sections of rhinoceros horn and from the tips of porcupine and echidna quills using a beam centrally located on the sample at the BioCAT facility. (b) Typical diffraction patterns obtained at the BioCAT facility for bundles of parallel fur fibres from Australian marsupials. These samples were found to be poorly diffracting and required thirty or more parallel strands to be irradiated to give reliable results.
Figure 3Typical off-centre diffraction patterns of 5 mammals taken on ChemMatCARS showing meridional reflections extending beyond the 5.15 nm reflection, the 91st order of the 46.7 nm lattice. These patterns reflect the wealth of diffraction from such keratin samples.
Figure 6Number of orders present for each of the two infinite lattices.
| Sample | Number of orders | |
|---|---|---|
| 46.7 nm | 62.6 | |
| Alpaca wool | 42 | 58 |
| Baboon hair | 50 | 72 |
| Cat whisker | 114 | 155 |
| Cat fur | 42 | 58 |
| Cow hair | 118 | 158 |
| Dog hair | 43 | 59 |
| Echidna quill | 41 | 54 |
| Elephant fine hair | 40 | 55 |
| Elephant coarse hair | 40 | 54 |
| Goat beard | 40 | 54 |
| Goat hair | 39 | 54 |
| Horse hair | 115 | 153 |
| Horse hoof | 39 | 54 |
| Human hair | 50 | 72 |
| Red kangaroo hair | 42 | 57 |
| White kangaroo hair | 42 | 56 |
| Koala hair | 40 | 54 |
| Lincoln wool | 40 | 55 |
| Orangutan | 39 | 53 |
| Pig hair | 39 | 57 |
| Porcupine quill | 40 | 54 |
| Rhinoceros | 114 | 154 |
| Rock wallaby | 44 | 58 |
Figure 4These three patterns are background-corrected equatorial plots, taken over 1 mm on either side of the meridional axis. (a) shows the complete plot showing sets of “spots” and arcs. There were usually 9 spots, the one nearest the centre illustrated in (b) giving the centre to centre distance between the IFs. The other “spots” are the various orders of the Bessel functions from which the IF and tetramer (protofibril) radii can be calculated. In most cases there were six orders available to determine the IF radii and 2 for the tetramer radii. For most samples there were 8 arcs which index onto a spacing of ~45 Å and are related to the presence of soaps [16] and one sharp arc. The sharp arc, indicated in (c), verifies the close binding of the alpha-helices forming the heterodimer since the centre to centre distance of the two alpha-helices is equal to the diameter of each single helix.
Equatorial results.
| Animal |
| Sample | Age | IF radius (nm) | B! |
| Tetramer radius (nm) | B! |
| IF-IF | Number of samples |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BC | CMC | ||||||||||||
| Alpaca |
| Wool bundle | 38.2 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.1 | 2 | 0.999 | 114 ± 2 | 1 | 2 | 2.98 | |
| Asian elephant |
| Hair thick | 50 y | 37.2 | 4 | 0.998 | 12.6 | 2 | 0.999 | 111 ± 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.98 |
| Asian elephant |
| Hair thin | 50 y | 37.4 | 6 | 0.998 | 13.1 | 2 | 1 | 113 ± 5 | 1 | 1 | 3.02 |
| Baboon 1 |
| Hair | 37.3 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.7 | 2 | 0.994 | 112 ± 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.00 | |
| Baboon 2 |
| Hair | 38.8 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.0 | 2 | 0.999 | 117 ± 2 | 1 | 1 | 3.01 | |
| Cat |
| Whisker | 2.5 y | 36.0 | 4 | 1 | 13.0 | 2 | 0.999 | 109 ± 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.02 |
| Cat |
| Hair | 22 y | 38.9 | 3 | 0.999 | 13.2 | 2 | 1 | 116 ± 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.98 |
| Calf |
| Head hair | 1 m | 37.7 | 3 | 0.999 | 13.0 | 2 | 1 | 112 ± 2 | 1 | 0 | 2.97 |
| Cow moppet |
| Hair from ear | 2-3 y | 37.7 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.9 | 2 | 0.999 | 112 ± 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.97 |
| Cow moppet wide |
| Tail hair | 2-3 y | 35.8 | 4 | 0.998 | 12.8 | 2 | 0.998 | 106 ± 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.96 |
| Cow goldie |
| Top head hair | 4 y | 38.1 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.8 | 2 | 1 | 115 ± 4 | 2 | 2 | 3.02 |
| Dog |
| Hair | 6 m | 37.9 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.8 | 2 | 1 | 112 ± 6 | 2 | 2 | 2.96 |
| Echidna |
| quill | 37.4 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.3 | 2 | 1 | 111 ± 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.98 | |
| Goat |
| Beard | 37.5 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.0 | 2 | 0.999 | 114 ± 4 | 1 | 3.04 | ||
| Goat |
| Head hair | 36.6 | 5 | 0.999 | 13.6 | 2 | 0.999 | 111 ± 3 | 1 | 3.03 | ||
| Horse |
| Hoof | 22 y | 37.9 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.5 | 2 | 0.999 | 115 ± 3 | 2 | 1 | 3.03 |
| Horse |
| Tail hair | 22 y | 34.9 | 4 | 0.998 | 13.1 | 2 | 0.999 | 104 ± 4 | 1 | 2 | 2.98 |
| Kangaroo, red |
| Fur bundle | 1–10 y | 38.3 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.0 | 2 | 0.999 | 116 ± 3 | 1 | 2 | 3.03 |
| Kangaroo, Western Grey |
| Fur bundle | 3–11 y | 38.6 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.2 | 2 | 0.999 | 113 ± 6 | 15 | 2 | 2.93 |
| Northern koala |
| Fur bundle | 8–13 y | 37.5 | 3 | 1 | 13.5 | 2 | 0.999 | 113 ± 4 | 1 | 2 | 3.01 |
| Orang-utan |
| Hair | 32 y | 39.1 | 4 | 1 | 13.2 | 2 | 0.999 | 114 ± 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.92 |
| Orang-utan |
| Hair | 37 y | 40.1 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.9 | 2 | 0.999 | 121 ± 3 | 2 | 3.06 | |
| Pig |
| Hair from ear | 35.5 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.4 | 2 | 0.999 | 107 ± 3 | 1 | 1 | 3.01 | |
| Porcupine |
| Quill | 36.9 | 4 | 0.998 | 12.6 | 2 | 0.999 | 111 ± 2 | 1 | 2 | 3.00 | |
| Rhinoceros |
| Horn | 35.4 | 4 | 0.998 | 12.8 | 2 | 0.999 | 107 ± 3 | 3 | 1 | 3.04 | |
| Rock wallaby |
| Hair bundle | 4 y | 38.9 | 4 | 0.999 | 12.4 | 2 | 0.999 | 119 ± 2 | 1 | 0 | 3.06 |
| Sheep |
| Wool | 37.9 | 4 | 0.999 | 13.1 | 4 | 1 | 114 ± 5 | 13 | 2 | 3.01 | |
| Average = 3.00 | |||||||||||||
| Standard Deviation = 0.04 | |||||||||||||
B! number of Bessel Points, BC: BioCAT, CMC: ChemMatCars.
Figure 5These are typical examples of the first-order Bessel function graphs used to determine the radii of the IFs (a) and the tetramers (b). The y-axis represent the Bessel functions, the x-axis represents X = n /d n , where n is the pixel value of the relevant peak, d = 46.7 nm, n = pixel value for 46.7 nm spacing. The slope of the line of best fit for each graph gives the required radius whilst R 2 is the statistical error in fitting the line to the actual peaks.