BACKGROUND: Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) is one of the most potent carcinogens generated in cigarette smoke. During smoking, cigarette filters trap a significant portion of mainstream smoke benzo[a]pyrene. This trapped portion is proportional to what exits the end of the filter and is drawn into the mouth of smokers. METHODS: We developed a new method to estimate mouth-level BaP intake using filter analysis. In this analysis, cigarettes are smoked by a smoking machine using a variety of conditions to yield a range of mainstream smoke deliveries, which approximate a range of human puffing characteristics. Mainstream smoke BaP collected on Cambridge filter pads and the corresponding 1-cm mouth-end cigarette filter butts is extracted, purified by solid-phase extraction, and quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a fluorescence detector. On the basis of the amount of BaP retained in cigarette butts and the amount collected on pads, we can relate them using a linear regression model. RESULTS: Using this model and subsequently analyzing cigarette filters collected from smokers, we are able to estimate their mouth-level intakes, which smokers received when they consumed cigarettes. We made a series of measurements using research cigarettes and select commercial cigarettes having a wide range of machine smoke "tar" and nicotine deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, results indicate a linear relation of BaP between cigarette filter butts and Cambridge filter pads, with R(2) ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. IMPACT: This technique provides a noninvasive means to examine intake on a per cigarette basis to examine both exposure and behavioral aspects of smoking.
BACKGROUND:Benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) is one of the most potent carcinogens generated in cigarette smoke. During smoking, cigarette filters trap a significant portion of mainstream smoke benzo[a]pyrene. This trapped portion is proportional to what exits the end of the filter and is drawn into the mouth of smokers. METHODS: We developed a new method to estimate mouth-level BaP intake using filter analysis. In this analysis, cigarettes are smoked by a smoking machine using a variety of conditions to yield a range of mainstream smoke deliveries, which approximate a range of human puffing characteristics. Mainstream smoke BaP collected on Cambridge filter pads and the corresponding 1-cm mouth-end cigarette filter butts is extracted, purified by solid-phase extraction, and quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with a fluorescence detector. On the basis of the amount of BaP retained in cigarette butts and the amount collected on pads, we can relate them using a linear regression model. RESULTS: Using this model and subsequently analyzing cigarette filters collected from smokers, we are able to estimate their mouth-level intakes, which smokers received when they consumed cigarettes. We made a series of measurements using research cigarettes and select commercial cigarettes having a wide range of machine smoke "tar" and nicotine deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, results indicate a linear relation of BaP between cigarette filter butts and Cambridge filter pads, with R(2) ranging from 0.93 to 0.98. IMPACT: This technique provides a noninvasive means to examine intake on a per cigarette basis to examine both exposure and behavioral aspects of smoking.
Authors: David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gregory M Polzin; Weijia Wu; Xizheng Yan; Joan M McCraw; Shadeed Abdul-Salaam; Ameer D Tavakoli; Liqin Zhang; David L Ashley; Clifford H Watson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: John L Pauly; Richard J O'Connor; Geraldine M Paszkiewicz; K Michael Cummings; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Peter G Shields Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christopher J Shepperd; Alison C Eldridge; Derek C Mariner; Michael McEwan; Graham Errington; Michael Dixon Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Zheng Li; Courtney D Sandau; Lovisa C Romanoff; Samuel P Caudill; Andreas Sjodin; Larry L Needham; Donald G Patterson Journal: Environ Res Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 6.498