Literature DB >> 22027259

IMRT for sinonasal tumors minimizes severe late ocular toxicity and preserves disease control and survival.

Fréderic Duprez1, Indira Madani, Lieve Morbée, Katrien Bonte, Philippe Deron, Vilmos Domján, Tom Boterberg, Werner De Gersem, Wilfried De Neve.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report late ocular (primary endpoint) and other toxicity, disease control, and survival (secondary endpoints) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for sinonasal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2009, 130 patients with nonmetastatic sinonasal tumors were treated with IMRT at Ghent University Hospital. Prescription doses were 70 Gy (n = 117) and 60-66 Gy (n = 13) at 2 Gy per fraction over 6-7 weeks. Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 82) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 23). One hundred and one (101) patients were treated postoperatively. Of 17 patients with recurrent tumors, 9 were reirradiated. T-stages were T1-2 (n = 39), T3 (n = 21), T4a (n = 38), and T4b (n = 22). Esthesioneuroblastoma was staged as Kadish A, B, and C in 1, 3, and 6 cases, respectively.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 52, range 15-121 months. There was no radiation-induced blindness in 86 patients available for late toxicity assessment (≥6 month follow-up). We observed late Grade 3 tearing in 10 patients, which reduced to Grade 1-2 in 5 patients and Grade 3 visual impairment because of radiation-induced ipsilateral retinopathy and neovascular glaucoma in 1 patient. There was no severe dry eye syndrome. The worst grade of late ocular toxicity was Grade 3 (n = 11), Grade 2 (n = 31), Grade 1 (n = 33), and Grade 0 (n = 11). Brain necrosis and osteoradionecrosis occurred in 6 and 1 patients, respectively. Actuarial 5-year local control and overall survival were 59% and 52%, respectively. On multivariate analysis local control was negatively affected by cribriform plate and brain invasion (p = 0.044 and 0.029, respectively) and absence of surgery (p = 0.009); overall survival was negatively affected by cribriform plate and orbit invasion (p = 0.04 and <0.001, respectively) and absence of surgery (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: IMRT for sinonasal tumors allowed delivering high doses to targets at minimized ocular toxicity, while maintaining disease control and survival. Avoidance of severe dry eye syndrome and radiation-induced blindness suggests IMRT as a standard treatment for sinonasal tumors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22027259     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma without clinical lymph node involvement : Which neck management is best?

Authors:  Pauline Castelnau-Marchand; Antonin Levy; Antoine Moya-Plana; Haïtham Mirghani; France Nguyen; Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; François Janot; Frédéric Kolb; François-Régis Ferrand; Stéphane Temam; Pierre Blanchard; Yungan Tao
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Coplanar VMAT vs. noncoplanar VMAT in the treatment of sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Ning Zhong-Hua; Jiang Jing-Ting; Li Xiao-Dong; Mu Jin-Ming; Mo Jun-Chong; Jin Jian-Xue; Gao Ming; Li Qi-Lin; Gu Wen-Dong; Chen Lu-Jun; Pei Hong-Lei
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Treatment outcomes after definitive radio(chemo)therapy for 17 lacrimal sac squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Xinmao Song; Huanyu He; Yi Zhu; Shengzi Wang; Jie Wang; Weifang Wang; Yi Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Sinonasal carcinoma: clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances.

Authors:  José Luis Llorente; Fernando López; Carlos Suárez; Mario A Hermsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Radionecrosis of the frontal lobe as a consequence of malignant ethmoid tumor management: incidence, diagnosis, risk factors, prevention and management.

Authors:  N Oker; P Lang; D Bresson; B George; J-P Guichard; M Wassef; E Sauvaget; S Froelich; R Kania; P Herman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Radiation therapy strategies for skull-base malignancies.

Authors:  J D Palmer; M E Gamez; K Ranta; H Ruiz-Garcia; J L Peterson; D M Blakaj; D Prevedello; R Carrau; A Mahajan; K L Chaichana; D M Trifiletti
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Robotic stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors.

Authors:  Gokhan Ozyigit; Mustafa Cengiz; Pervin Hurmuz; Gozde Yazici; Melis Gultekin; Fadil Akyol; Ferah Yildiz; Murat Gurkaynak; Faruk Zorlu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-31

8.  Radiooncological View on Therapy Outcome after Multidisciplinary Treatment of Sinonasal Tumors.

Authors:  Olena Klymenko; Anna Maria Stefanie Buchberger; Barbara Wollenberg; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Victoria Kehl; Stephanie E Combs; Anja Pickhard; Steffi U Pigorsch
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Delaying Postoperative Radiotherapy in Low-Grade Esthesioneuroblastoma: Is It Worth the Wait?

Authors:  Satoshi Kiyofuji; Vijay Agarwal; Joshua D Hughes; Robert L Foote; Jeffrey R Janus; Eric J Moore; Caterina Giannini; Michael J Link; Jamie J Van Gompel
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-03-25

10.  A simple optimization approach for improving target dose homogeneity in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Lu; Ji-Yong Zhang; Mei Li; Michael Lok-Man Cheung; Yang-Kang Li; Jing Zheng; Bao-Tian Huang; Wu-Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.