AIMS: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with bundle branch block (BBB) have a poor prognosis, but distinction between left (L)- and right (R)-sided BBB is seldom made in epidemiological studies. We studied long-term mortality associated with RBBB and LBBB in the TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study. METHODS AND RESULTS:TRACE screened consecutive patients presenting with an MI and recorded clinical, electro- and echo-cardiographic variables. Subsequently, deaths were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 15 years. In total, 6676 consecutive patients with MI were hospitalized at 27 centres in Denmark. Of these, 533 (8%) had BBB, of whom 260 (4%) had RBBB and 273 (4%) had LBBB. Overall, 5196 (78%) patients died, 256 (94%) with LBBB and 235 (90%) with RBBB compared with 4705 (77%) of those without BBB (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, hazard ratios (HRs) of RBBB and LBBB were 1.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.42] and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.91-1.20), respectively. There was interaction between each type of BBB and left ventricular (LV) systolic function (P = 0.02). Right BBB was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with reduced LV systolic function [HR = 1.31 with wall motion index (WMI) ≤ 1.5 (95% CI, 1.11-1.55] while LBBB had a poor prognosis in patients with preserved LV systolic (HR if WMI > 1.5, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.57). CONCLUSIONS:Right BBB was a predictor of increased mortality in patients with reduced LV systolic function, whereas LBBB was a marker of increased mortality in patients with preserved LV systolic function.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with bundle branch block (BBB) have a poor prognosis, but distinction between left (L)- and right (R)-sided BBB is seldom made in epidemiological studies. We studied long-term mortality associated with RBBB and LBBB in the TRAndolapril Cardiac Evaluation (TRACE) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRACE screened consecutive patients presenting with an MI and recorded clinical, electro- and echo-cardiographic variables. Subsequently, deaths were recorded during a minimum follow-up of 15 years. In total, 6676 consecutive patients with MI were hospitalized at 27 centres in Denmark. Of these, 533 (8%) had BBB, of whom 260 (4%) had RBBB and 273 (4%) had LBBB. Overall, 5196 (78%) patients died, 256 (94%) with LBBB and 235 (90%) with RBBB compared with 4705 (77%) of those without BBB (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, hazard ratios (HRs) of RBBB and LBBB were 1.23 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.42] and 1.05 (95% CI, 0.91-1.20), respectively. There was interaction between each type of BBB and left ventricular (LV) systolic function (P = 0.02). Right BBB was associated with a worse prognosis in patients with reduced LV systolic function [HR = 1.31 with wall motion index (WMI) ≤ 1.5 (95% CI, 1.11-1.55] while LBBB had a poor prognosis in patients with preserved LV systolic (HR if WMI > 1.5, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.12-2.57). CONCLUSIONS: Right BBB was a predictor of increased mortality in patients with reduced LV systolic function, whereas LBBB was a marker of increased mortality in patients with preserved LV systolic function.
Authors: Pierpaolo Pellicori; Anil C Joseph; Jufen Zhang; Elena Lukaschuk; Nasser Sherwi; Christos V Bourantas; Huan Loh; Andrew L Clark; John Gf Cleland Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Zhu-ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Laura Loehr; Wayne Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Eric A Whitsel; Larisa Tereshchenko; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Heli Tolppanen; Krista Siirila-Waris; Veli-Pekka Harjola; David Marono; Jiri Parenica; Philipp Kreutzinger; Tuomo Nieminen; Marie Pavlusova; Tuukka Tarvasmaki; Raphael Twerenbold; Jukka Tolonen; Roman Miklik; Markku S Nieminen; Jindrich Spinar; Christian Mueller; Johan Lassus Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2015-10-30
Authors: M Alventosa-Zaidin; G Pera; C Roca Saumell; N Mengual Miralles; M V Zamora Sanchez; T Gros Garcia; L Guix Font; M Benitez Camps; J Francisco-Pascual; J Brugada Terradellas Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Timo Schmitz; Christian Thilo; Jakob Linseisen; Margit Heier; Annette Peters; Bernhard Kuch; Christa Meisinger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Juan Cinca; Ana Mendez; Teresa Puig; Andreu Ferrero; Eulalia Roig; Rafael Vazquez; Jose R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Luis Alonso-Pulpon; Juan Delgado; Josep Brugada; Domingo Pascual-Figal Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 15.534