Literature DB >> 22026922

Association between DNA-repair polymorphisms and survival in pancreatic cancer patients treated with combination chemotherapy.

Elisa Giovannetti1, Paola Pacetti, Michele Reni, Leticia G Leon, Andrea Mambrini, Enrico Vasile, Michele Ghidini, Niccola Funel, Matteo Lucchesi, Stefano Cereda, Godefridus J Peters, Maurizio Cantore.   

Abstract

AIM: This multicenter study evaluated the association of 11 candidate polymorphisms in eight genes with outcome of pancreatic cancer patients treated with the equivalent polychemotherapeutic regimens: cisplatin/epirubicin/capecitabine/gemcitabine, cisplatin/docetaxel/capecitabine/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/capecitabine plus epirubicin/cisplatin intra-arterial infusion. PATIENTS &
METHODS: Towards this end, polymorphisms were assessed in DNA from 122 pancreatic cancer stage-III/IV patients, and their associations with toxicity/response and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were evaluated using Pearson-χ(2) and log-rank test.
RESULTS: Patients harboring XPD Gln751Gln, XPD Asp312Asn + Asn312Asn or XRCC1 Arg399Gln + Gln399Gln genotypes had a worse prognosis. XPD Gln751Gln (hazard ratio: 1.9; p = 0.003), as well as a combination of over two risk genotypes (hazard ratio: 2.7; p < 0.001), emerged as independent predictors for death risk at multivariate analysis. No correlations were observed with toxicity. Conversely, XPD Gln751Gln was associated with shorter PFS, while the lack of association with overall survival/PFS in gemcitabine monotherapy-treated patients suggested its role only for platinum-based regimens.
CONCLUSION: Polymorphisms of DNA-repair genes appear to be candidate biomarkers of primary resistance to gemcitabine/cisplatin-based polychemotherapeutic regimens. The relatively small sample size, coupled with the retrospective and exploratory design of the present study, imply that these results should be considered as hypothesis generators, and should be further evaluated in larger and adequately designed retrospective/prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22026922     DOI: 10.2217/pgs.11.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  15 in total

1.  Influences of ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, GSTP1, GSTT1, and MTHFR polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in gastric cancer patients treated with EOF chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rujiao Liu; Xiaoying Zhao; Xin Liu; Zhiyu Chen; Lixin Qiu; Ruixuan Geng; Weijian Guo; Guang He; Jiliang Yin; Jin Li; Xiaodong Zhu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Association between polymorphisms of BAG-1 and XPD and chemotherapy sensitivity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with vinorelbine combined cisplatin regimen.

Authors:  Ping Li; Ya-Di Wang; Jian Cheng; Jun-Chen Chen; Min-Wen Ha
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 3.  Systemic therapies for pancreatic cancer--the role of pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  Ross A Soo; Wei-Peng Yong; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.465

4.  Biodegradable Ultrasmall-in-Nano Architectures Loaded with Cisplatin Prodrug in Combination with Ionizing Radiation Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pei Pei Che; Ana Katrina Mapanao; Alessandro Gregori; Maria Laura Ermini; Agata Zamborlin; Mjriam Capula; Danitsja Ngadimin; Ben J Slotman; Valerio Voliani; Peter Sminia; Elisa Giovannetti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Phase II study of satraplatin and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a pharmacogenetic assessment of outcome and toxicity.

Authors:  William D Figg; Cindy H Chau; Ravi A Madan; James L Gulley; Rui Gao; Tristan M Sissung; Shawn Spencer; Melony Beatson; Jeanny Aragon-Ching; Seth M Steinberg; William L Dahut
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 6.  FOLFIRINOX and translational studies: Towards personalized therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Caparello; Laura L Meijer; Ingrid Garajova; Alfredo Falcone; Tessa Y Le Large; Niccola Funel; Geert Kazemier; Godefridus J Peters; Enrico Vasile; Elisa Giovannetti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Genetic risk of subsequent esophageal cancer in lymphoma and breast cancer long-term survival patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  E Boldrin; E Rumiato; M Fassan; M Rugge; M Cagol; D Marino; V Chiarion-Sileni; A Ruol; M Gusella; F Pasini; A Amadori; D Saggioro
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 8.  Exploiting base excision repair to improve therapeutic approaches for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  George Sharbeen; Joshua McCarroll; David Goldstein; Phoebe A Phillips
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2015-03-27

9.  Extrapolating the effect of deleterious nsSNPs in the binding adaptability of flavopiridol with CDK7 protein: a molecular dynamics approach.

Authors:  C George Priya Doss; N Nagasundaram; Chiranjib Chakraborty; Luonan Chen; Hailong Zhu
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.639

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage.

Authors:  J M Findlay; M R Middleton; I Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.