Literature DB >> 22026751

The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: score validity among medicine residents.

David A Cook1, Warren G Thompson, Kris G Thomas.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) purports to measure motivation using the expectancy-value model. Although it is widely used in other fields, this instrument has received little study in health professions education.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of MSLQ scores.
METHODS: We conducted a validity study evaluating the relationships of MSLQ scores to other variables and their internal structure (reliability and factor analysis). Participants included 210 internal medicine and family medicine residents participating in a web-based course on ambulatory medicine at an academic medical centre. Measurements included pre-course MSLQ scores, pre- and post-module motivation surveys, post-module knowledge test and post-module Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) scores.
RESULTS: Internal consistency was universally high for all MSLQ items together (Cronbach's α = 0.93) and for each domain (α ≥ 0.67). Total MSLQ scores showed statistically significant positive associations with post-test knowledge scores. For example, a 1-point rise in total MSLQ score was associated with a 4.4% increase in post-test scores (β = 4.4; p < 0.0001). Total MSLQ scores showed moderately strong, statistically significant associations with several other measures of effort, motivation and satisfaction. Scores on MSLQ domains demonstrated associations that generally aligned with our hypotheses. Self-efficacy and control of learning belief scores demonstrated the strongest domain-specific relationships with knowledge scores (β = 2.9 for both). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a borderline model fit. Follow-up exploratory factor analysis revealed the scores of five factors (self-efficacy, intrinsic interest, test anxiety, extrinsic goals, attribution) demonstrated psychometric and predictive properties similar to those of the original scales.
CONCLUSIONS: Scores on the MSLQ are reliable and predict meaningful outcomes. However, the factor structure suggests a simplified model might better fit the empiric data. Future research might consider how assessing and responding to motivation could enhance learning. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22026751     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04077.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  14 in total

1.  Exploring the Cultivation of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) Strategies Among Pre-Clinical Medical Students in Two Medical Schools.

Authors:  Shuh Shing Lee; Dujeepa D Samarasekera; Joong Hiong Sim; Wei-Han Hong; Chan Choong Foong; Vinod Pallath; Jamuna Vadivelu
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12-26

2.  Virtual patient simulations and optimal social learning context: a replication of an aptitude-treatment interaction effect.

Authors:  Teresa R Johnson; Rebecca Lyons; Regis Kopper; Kyle J Johnsen; Benjamin C Lok; Juan C Cendan
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  The self-efficacy in patient-centeredness questionnaire - a new measure of medical student and physician confidence in exhibiting patient-centered behaviors.

Authors:  Robert Zachariae; Maja O'Connor; Berit Lassesen; Martin Olesen; Louise Binow Kjær; Marianne Thygesen; Anne Mette Mørcke
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Enhancing motivation with the "virtual" supervisory role: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Majken T Wingo; Kris G Thomas; Warren G Thompson; David A Cook
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Comfort and experience with online learning: trends over nine years and associations with knowledge.

Authors:  David A Cook; Warren G Thompson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Can Individualized Learning Plans in an advanced clinical experience course for fourth year medical students foster Self-Directed Learning?

Authors:  Maribeth B Chitkara; Daniel Satnick; Wei-Hsin Lu; Howard Fleit; Roderick A Go; Latha Chandran
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Medical student changes in self-regulated learning during the transition to the clinical environment.

Authors:  Kenneth K Cho; Brahm Marjadi; Vicki Langendyk; Wendy Hu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  The role of the assessment policy in the relation between learning and performance.

Authors:  Rob Kickert; Karen M Stegers-Jager; Marieke Meeuwisse; Peter Prinzie; Lidia R Arends
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.251

9.  Changes in medical students' motivation and self-regulated learning: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Kyong-Jee Kim; Hye W Jang
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-28

10.  Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.