Literature DB >> 22026492

The role of group decision making processes in the creation of clinical guidelines.

Tim Hopthrow1, Gene Feder, Susan Michie.   

Abstract

Guideline development groups are an integral part of evidence-based healthcare and will remain so for the foreseeable future. There is a need for the efficient production of high-quality guidelines both to ensure high standards of care and to conserve resources. Social psychological research on group processes provides valuable information that can be applied to studying the functioning of guideline development groups, including the methods they use to develop recommendations. This article describes four key concepts in the group process literature: information sharing, systematic processing, group development, and group potential productivity. We evaluate their importance for guideline development groups and conclude with methodological suggestions for the study of these complex processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22026492     DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry        ISSN: 0954-0261


  4 in total

Review 1.  Gender Parity in Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Karen E A Burns; Flavia R Machado; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Deborah J Cook; Carolyn S Calfee; Lorraine B Ware; Ellen L Burnham; Niranjan Kissoon; John C Marshall; Jordi Mancebo; Simon Finfer; Christiane Hartog; Konrad Reinhart; Kathryn Maitland; Renee D Stapleton; Arthur Kwizera; Pravin Amin; Fekri Abroug; Orla Smith; Jon H Laake; Gentle S Shrestha; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development.

Authors:  Wojtek Wiercioch; Elie A Akl; Nancy Santesso; Yuan Zhang; Rebecca L Morgan; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Sérgio Kowalski; Tejan Baldeh; Reem A Mustafa; Kaja-Triin Laisaar; Ulla Raid; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Matthew Ventresca; Ignacio Neumann; Maicon Falavigna; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gian Paolo Morgano; Jan Brożek; Meghan McConnell; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and public health: a qualitative study of views from the inside.

Authors:  Lou Atkins; Jonathan A Smith; Michael P Kelly; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Reaching beyond the review of research evidence: a qualitative study of decision making during the development of clinical practice guidelines for disease prevention in healthcare.

Authors:  Linda Richter Sundberg; Rickard Garvare; Monica Elisabeth Nyström
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.