Literature DB >> 22026489

The service context for clinical guidelines: supporting guideline implementation by assuring and improving the quality of service in which clinicians work.

Adrian Worrall1.   

Abstract

This paper argues that accreditation schemes and quality networks promote good contexts for the implementation of clinical guidelines. It raises questions about how organizational standards should be developed, structured and focused, how clinical guidelines and organizational standards should connect, how to practically increase the number of such schemes and their scope, and the role of professional bodies in this. There is a considerable amount of administration involved in running an accreditation scheme or quality network and there are risks involved in starting in new areas. One way forward is for professional bodies to partner to share risks and to build a common operating platform for the administration of the work across the professional bodies. This platform could be guided by topic experts within the bodies.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22026489     DOI: 10.3109/09540261.2011.606542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry        ISSN: 0954-0261


  4 in total

1.  Impact of Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Guidelines on Peri-Anesthesia Care for Rat Models of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Years 2005 and 2015.

Authors:  Aurelie Thomas; Johann Detilleux; Paul Flecknell; Charlotte Sandersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Perspective On Excellence in Forensic Mental Health Services: What We Can Learn From Oncology and Other Medical Services.

Authors:  Harry G Kennedy; Alexander Simpson; Quazi Haque
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Impact of peer-led quality improvement networks on quality of inpatient mental health care: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lina Aimola; Sarah Jasim; Neeraj Tripathi; Sarah Tucker; Adrian Worrall; Alan Quirk; Mike J Crawford
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  A tool to evaluate proportionality and necessity in the use of restrictive practices in forensic mental health settings: the DRILL tool (Dundrum restriction, intrusion and liberty ladders).

Authors:  Harry G Kennedy; Ronan Mullaney; Paul McKenna; John Thompson; David Timmons; Pauline Gill; Owen P O'Sullivan; Paul Braham; Dearbhla Duffy; Anthony Kearns; Sally Linehan; Damian Mohan; Stephen Monks; Lisa McLoughlin; Paul O'Connell; Conor O'Neill; Brenda Wright; Ken O'Reilly; Mary Davoren
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.