Literature DB >> 2202515

A mathematical model of erythropoiesis in mice and rats. Part 4: Differences between bone marrow and spleen.

K Pantel1, M Loeffler, B Bungart, H E Wichmann.   

Abstract

In a preceding analysis we hypothesized that the most important parameter controlled by erythropoietic regulation in vivo is the degree of amplification (number of cell divisions) in the CFU-E and erythroblast cell stages. It was concluded that erythropoietic amplification in vivo is controlled according to a sigmoidal dose-response relationship with respect to the control parameter which is the haematocrit (or haemoglobin concentration). Here, this hypothesis is extended to include the differences in murine bone marrow and splenic erythropoiesis that are described and quantified by different dose-response relationships. Comparing several sets of experimental data with mathematical model simulations, this approach leads to the following conclusions: (i) in the unperturbed normal steady state at least one extra erythropoietic cell division takes place in the spleen compared with the bone marrow; (ii) a strong erythropoietic stimulus, such as severe bleeding or hypoxia, can induce five to six additional cell divisions in the spleen but only two to three additional divisions in the bone marrow; this results in a considerable increase in the spleen's contribution to erythropoiesis from about 10% in normal animals to over 40% during strong stimulation; (iii) under erythropoietic suppression, such as red cell transfusion, a similar number of cell divisions is skipped in both organs and the splenic contribution to erythropoiesis remains unchanged. In conclusion, the concept that bone marrow and spleen microenvironments differ in the dose-response relationship for erythropoietic regulation provides an explanation for the changing contribution of splenic murine erythropoiesis following a variety of experimental treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2202515     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1990.tb01125.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Kinet        ISSN: 0008-8730


  6 in total

1.  Basic pharmacodynamic models for agents that alter production of natural cells.

Authors:  W Krzyzanski; R Ramakrishnan; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1999-10

2.  Rats provide a superior model of human stress erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Jingxin Zhang; Yijie Liu; Xu Han; Yang Mei; Jing Yang; Zheng J Zhang; Xinyan Lu; Peng Ji
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 3.  From the Cradle to the Grave: The Role of Macrophages in Erythropoiesis and Erythrophagocytosis.

Authors:  Thomas R L Klei; Sanne M Meinderts; Timo K van den Berg; Robin van Bruggen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  A biomathematical model of human erythropoiesis and iron metabolism.

Authors:  Sibylle Schirm; Markus Scholz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A biomathematical model of human erythropoiesis under erythropoietin and chemotherapy administration.

Authors:  Sibylle Schirm; Christoph Engel; Markus Loeffler; Markus Scholz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A combined model of human erythropoiesis and granulopoiesis under growth factor and chemotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Sibylle Schirm; Christoph Engel; Markus Loeffler; Markus Scholz
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2014-05-26       Impact factor: 2.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.