BACKGROUND:Chronic low back pain is a common problem lacking highly effective treatment options. Small trials suggest that yoga may have benefits for this condition. This trial was designed to determine whether yoga is more effective than conventional stretching exercises or a self-care book for primary care patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: A total of 228 adults with chronic low back pain were randomized to 12 weekly classes of yoga (92 patients) or conventional stretching exercises (91 patients) or a self-care book (45 patients). Back-related functional status (modified Roland Disability Questionnaire, a 23-point scale) and bothersomeness of pain (an 11-point numerical scale) at 12 weeks were the primary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks by interviewers unaware of treatment group. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline values, 12-week outcomes for the yoga group were superior to those for the self-care group (mean difference for function, -2.5 [95% CI, -3.7 to -1.3]; P < .001; mean difference for symptoms, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.7 to -0.4]; P < .001). At 26 weeks, function for the yoga group remained superior (mean difference, -1.8 [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.5]; P < .001). Yoga was not superior to conventional stretching exercises at any time point. CONCLUSION: Yoga classes were more effective than a self-care book, but not more effective than stretching classes, in improving function and reducing symptoms due to chronic low back pain, with benefits lasting at least several months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00447668.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Chronic low back pain is a common problem lacking highly effective treatment options. Small trials suggest that yoga may have benefits for this condition. This trial was designed to determine whether yoga is more effective than conventional stretching exercises or a self-care book for primary care patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: A total of 228 adults with chronic low back pain were randomized to 12 weekly classes of yoga (92 patients) or conventional stretching exercises (91 patients) or a self-care book (45 patients). Back-related functional status (modified Roland Disability Questionnaire, a 23-point scale) and bothersomeness of pain (an 11-point numerical scale) at 12 weeks were the primary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, and 26 weeks by interviewers unaware of treatment group. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline values, 12-week outcomes for the yoga group were superior to those for the self-care group (mean difference for function, -2.5 [95% CI, -3.7 to -1.3]; P < .001; mean difference for symptoms, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.7 to -0.4]; P < .001). At 26 weeks, function for the yoga group remained superior (mean difference, -1.8 [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.5]; P < .001). Yoga was not superior to conventional stretching exercises at any time point. CONCLUSION: Yoga classes were more effective than a self-care book, but not more effective than stretching classes, in improving function and reducing symptoms due to chronic low back pain, with benefits lasting at least several months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00447668.
Authors: Bradly P Jacobs; Wolf Mehling; Andrew L Avins; Harley A Goldberg; Michael Acree; Judith Hanson Lasater; Roger J Cole; David S Riley; Stephanie Maurer Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: Kimberly Anne Williams; John Petronis; David Smith; David Goodrich; Juan Wu; Neelima Ravi; Edward J Doyle; R Gregory Juckett; Maria Munoz Kolar; Richard Gross; Lois Steinberg Journal: Pain Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Karen J Sherman; Daniel C Cherkin; Andrea J Cook; Rene J Hawkes; Richard A Deyo; Robert Wellman; Partap S Khalsa Journal: Trials Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mary Lou Galantino; Todd M Bzdewka; Jamie L Eissler-Russo; Matthew L Holbrook; Eric P Mogck; Paula Geigle; John T Farrar Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: M Von Korff; J E Moore; K Lorig; D C Cherkin; K Saunders; V M González; D Laurent; C Rutter; F Comite Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1998-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: L Susan Wieland; Nicole Skoetz; Karen Pilkington; Ramaprabhu Vempati; Christopher R D'Adamo; Brian M Berman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-01-12
Authors: Jonathan Berlowitz; Daniel L Hall; Christopher Joyce; Lisa Fredman; Karen J Sherman; Robert B Saper; Eric J Roseen Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: A Rani Elwy; Erik J Groessl; Susan V Eisen; Kristen E Riley; Meghan Maiya; Jennifer P Lee; Andrew Sarkin; Crystal L Park Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-07-02 Impact factor: 5.043