Literature DB >> 22025095

Modest public health impact of nontargeted human immunodeficiency virus screening in 29 emergency departments.

Kayigan Wilson d'Almeida1, Gérald Kierzek, Pierre de Truchis, Stéphane Le Vu, Dominique Pateron, Bertrand Renaud, Caroline Semaille, Vanina Bousquet, François Simon, Didier Guillemot, France Lert, Anne-Claude Crémieux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To lower the number of undiagnosed infections and to improve early detection, international health agencies have promoted nontargeted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in health care settings, including emergency departments (EDs). This strategy remains controversial and has yet to be tested on a large scale. We assessed the public health impact of nontargeted HIV-rapid test (RT) screening among ED patients in the metropolitan area of Paris (11.7 million inhabitants), where half of France's new HIV cases are diagnosed annually.
METHODS: During a randomly assigned 6-week period for each of the 29 participating EDs, 18- to 64-year-old patients who were able to provide consent for HIV testing were offered a fingerstick whole-blood HIV RT. Main outcome measures were the number of patients tested for HIV and their characteristics vs those of the general metropolitan Paris population and the proportion of newly diagnosed HIV-positive patients among those tested and their characteristics vs those from the national HIV case surveillance.
RESULTS: Among 138,691 visits, there were 78,411 eligible patients, 20,962 of whom (27.0%) were offered HIV RT; 13,229 (63.1%) accepted testing and 12,754 (16.3%) were tested. The ED patients' characteristics reflected the general population distribution. Eighteen patients received new HIV diagnoses (0.14%; 95% confidence interval, 0.08%-0.22%). Like national HIV case surveillance patients, they belonged to a high-risk group (n = 17), were previously tested (n = 12), and were either symptomatic or had a CD4 lymphocyte count lower than 350/μL, suggesting late-stage infections (n = 8); 12 patients were linked to care.
CONCLUSIONS: Nontargeted HIV testing in EDs was feasible but identified only a few new HIV diagnoses, often at late stages, and, unexpectedly, most patients belonged to a high-risk group. Our findings do not support the implementation of nontargeted screening of the general population in EDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22025095     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  37 in total

1.  The undiagnosed HIV epidemic in France and its implications for HIV screening strategies.

Authors:  Virginie Supervie; Jacques D A Ndawinz; Sara Lodi; Dominique Costagliola
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Expanded HIV Testing Strategy Leveraging the Electronic Medical Record Uncovers Undiagnosed Infection Among Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Uriel R Felsen; Chinazo O Cunningham; Moonseong Heo; Donna C Futterman; Jeffrey M Weiss; Barry S Zingman
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Factors Influencing Uptake of Rapid HIV and Hepatitis C Screening Among Drug Misusing Adult Emergency Department Patients: Implications for Future HIV/HCV Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Allison K DeLong; Tao Liu; Janette R Baird
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-11

4.  Acute HIV infection and implications of fourth-generation HIV screening in emergency departments.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Michael S Lyons; Douglas A E White; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Richard E Rothman
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Brief intervention to increase emergency department uptake of combined rapid human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C screening among a drug misusing population.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Janette R Baird; Tao Liu; Lynn E Taylor; Brian T Montague; Ted D Nirenberg
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Brief report: Validation of a quantitative HIV risk prediction tool using a national HIV testing cohort.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Emily Hopkins; Meggan M Bucossi; Michael S Lyons; Richard E Rothman; Douglas A E White; Alia A Al-Tayyib; Lucy Bradley-Springer; Jonathan D Campbell; Allison L Sabel; Mark W Thrun
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Impact of a primary care national policy on HIV screening in France: a longitudinal analysis between 2006 and 2013.

Authors:  Jonathan Sicsic; Olivier Saint-Lary; Elisabeth Rouveix; Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Comparison of enhanced targeted rapid HIV screening using the Denver HIV risk score to nontargeted rapid HIV screening in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jason S Haukoos; Emily Hopkins; Brooke Bender; Comilla Sasson; Alia A Al-Tayyib; Mark W Thrun
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Barriers to HIV Testing: Patient and Provider Perspectives in the Deep South.

Authors:  Jenni M Wise; Corilyn Ott; Andres Azuero; Robin Gaines Lanzi; Susan Davies; Andrea Gardner; David E Vance; Mirjam-Colette Kempf
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-04

10.  Is self-perceived HIV risk congruent with reported HIV risk among traditionally lower HIV risk and prevalence adult emergency department patients? Implications for HIV testing.

Authors:  Kimberly Pringle; Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.