BACKGROUND: Patient care workers in acute care hospitals are at high risk of injury. Recent studies have quantified risks and demonstrated a higher risk for aides than for nurses. However, no detailed studies to date have used OSHA injury definitions to allow for better comparability across studies. METHODS: We linked records from human resources and occupational health services databases at two large academic hospitals for nurses (n = 5,991) and aides (n = 1,543) in patient care units. Crude rates, rate ratios, and confidence intervals were calculated for injuries involving no days away and those involving at least 1 day away from work. RESULTS: Aides have substantially higher injury rates per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTEs) than nurses for both injuries involving days away from work (11.3 vs. 7.2) and those involving no days away (9.9 vs. 5.7). Back injuries were the most common days away (DA) injuries, while sharps injuries were the most common no days away (NDA) injuries. Pediatric/neonatal units and non-inpatient units had the lowest injury rates. Operating rooms and the float pool had high DA injury rates for both occupations, and stepdown units had high rates for nurses. NDA injuries were highest in the operating room for both nurses and aides. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the importance of a continuing emphasis on preventing back and sharps injuries and reducing risks faced by aides in the hospital setting. Uniform injury definitions and work time measures can help benchmark safety performance and focus prevention efforts.
BACKGROUND:Patient care workers in acute care hospitals are at high risk of injury. Recent studies have quantified risks and demonstrated a higher risk for aides than for nurses. However, no detailed studies to date have used OSHA injury definitions to allow for better comparability across studies. METHODS: We linked records from human resources and occupational health services databases at two large academic hospitals for nurses (n = 5,991) and aides (n = 1,543) in patient care units. Crude rates, rate ratios, and confidence intervals were calculated for injuries involving no days away and those involving at least 1 day away from work. RESULTS: Aides have substantially higher injury rates per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTEs) than nurses for both injuries involving days away from work (11.3 vs. 7.2) and those involving no days away (9.9 vs. 5.7). Back injuries were the most common days away (DA) injuries, while sharps injuries were the most common no days away (NDA) injuries. Pediatric/neonatal units and non-inpatient units had the lowest injury rates. Operating rooms and the float pool had high DA injury rates for both occupations, and stepdown units had high rates for nurses. NDA injuries were highest in the operating room for both nurses and aides. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the importance of a continuing emphasis on preventing back and sharps injuries and reducing risks faced by aides in the hospital setting. Uniform injury definitions and work time measures can help benchmark safety performance and focus prevention efforts.
Authors: Jack T Dennerlein; Karen Hopcia; Grace Sembajwe; Christopher Kenwood; Anne M Stoddard; T Helene Tveito; Dean M Hashimoto; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Jessica A R Williams; Glorian Sorensen; Dean Hashimoto; Karen Hopcia; Gregory R Wagner; Leslie I Boden Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Nicole Le Moual; Raphaëlle Varraso; Jan Paul Zock; Paul Henneberger; Frank E Speizer; Francine Kauffmann; Carlos A Camargo Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Erika L Sabbath; Jie Yang; Jack T Dennerlein; Leslie I Boden; Dean Hashimoto; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Deborah McLellan; Jack T Dennerlein; Nicolaas P Pronk; Jennifer D Allen; Leslie I Boden; Cassandra A Okechukwu; Dean Hashimoto; Anne Stoddard; Gregory R Wagner Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Deborah L McLellan; Erika L Sabbath; Jack T Dennerlein; Eve M Nagler; David A Hurtado; Nicolaas P Pronk; Gregory R Wagner Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-08-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Maurizio Macaluso; Lauren A Summerville; Meredith E Tabangin; Nancy M Daraiseh Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Glorian Sorensen; Eve M Nagler; Dean Hashimoto; Jack T Dennerlein; Julie V Theron; Anne M Stoddard; Orfeu Buxton; Lorraine M Wallace; Christopher Kenwood; Candace C Nelson; Sara L Tamers; Michael P Grant; Gregory Wagner Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 2.162