BACKGROUND: Overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 plays a role in prostate cancer progression, particularly in transformation to androgen-independent disease. Androgen-independent prostate cancers have been shown to harbor Bcl-2 gene copy number gains frequently suggesting that this genetic alteration might play a role in Bcl-2 overexpression. The relation of Bcl-2 overexpression and copy number gains or translocation of the BCL-2 gene in prostate cancer under hormone-naïve conditions is unknown. METHODS: Prostate cancers of 3,261 hormone-naïve patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were arrayed in a TMA with one tissue core (diameter 0.6 mm) per tumor. Bcl-2 immunohistochemistry, analyzed for Bcl-2 expression level (negative, low, and high), was correlated with clinical, histopathological and molecular (Ki67, p53) tumor features, and biochemical failure. Cancers with high-level Bcl-2 expression were evaluated for genetic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: Bcl-2 expression was significantly up-regulated in tumors with aggressive phenotype as indicated by high Gleason score (P < 0.0001), advanced stage (P < 0.0001), and high proliferation index (P = 0.0114). The different Bcl-2 expression levels translated into significantly different survival curves showing better outcome for patients with lower Bcl-2 levels. The prognostic information obtained from the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 was independent from the proliferation index (Ki67) of the cancer. FISH analysis detected no copy number gains or translocation of the Bcl-2 gene. CONCLUSION: Bcl-2 overexpression in prostate cancers under hormone-naïve conditions is not associated with increased copy numbers of the gene. This suggests that these frequently detected genetic alterations in androgen-independent tumors occur late in prostate cancer progression.
BACKGROUND: Overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 plays a role in prostate cancer progression, particularly in transformation to androgen-independent disease. Androgen-independent prostate cancers have been shown to harbor Bcl-2 gene copy number gains frequently suggesting that this genetic alteration might play a role in Bcl-2 overexpression. The relation of Bcl-2 overexpression and copy number gains or translocation of the BCL-2 gene in prostate cancer under hormone-naïve conditions is unknown. METHODS:Prostate cancers of 3,261 hormone-naïve patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were arrayed in a TMA with one tissue core (diameter 0.6 mm) per tumor. Bcl-2 immunohistochemistry, analyzed for Bcl-2 expression level (negative, low, and high), was correlated with clinical, histopathological and molecular (Ki67, p53) tumor features, and biochemical failure. Cancers with high-level Bcl-2 expression were evaluated for genetic aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS:Bcl-2 expression was significantly up-regulated in tumors with aggressive phenotype as indicated by high Gleason score (P < 0.0001), advanced stage (P < 0.0001), and high proliferation index (P = 0.0114). The different Bcl-2 expression levels translated into significantly different survival curves showing better outcome for patients with lower Bcl-2 levels. The prognostic information obtained from the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 was independent from the proliferation index (Ki67) of the cancer. FISH analysis detected no copy number gains or translocation of the Bcl-2 gene. CONCLUSION:Bcl-2 overexpression in prostate cancers under hormone-naïve conditions is not associated with increased copy numbers of the gene. This suggests that these frequently detected genetic alterations in androgen-independent tumors occur late in prostate cancer progression.
Authors: Sabine A S Langie; Gudrun Koppen; Daniel Desaulniers; Fahd Al-Mulla; Rabeah Al-Temaimi; Amedeo Amedei; Amaya Azqueta; William H Bisson; Dustin G Brown; Gunnar Brunborg; Amelia K Charles; Tao Chen; Annamaria Colacci; Firouz Darroudi; Stefano Forte; Laetitia Gonzalez; Roslida A Hamid; Lisbeth E Knudsen; Luc Leyns; Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi; Lorenzo Memeo; Chiara Mondello; Carmel Mothersill; Ann-Karin Olsen; Sofia Pavanello; Jayadev Raju; Emilio Rojas; Rabindra Roy; Elizabeth P Ryan; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Hosni K Salem; A Ivana Scovassi; Neetu Singh; Monica Vaccari; Frederik J Van Schooten; Mahara Valverde; Jordan Woodrick; Luoping Zhang; Nik van Larebeke; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Andrew R Collins Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Nicole A Lavender; Erica N Rogers; Susan Yeyeodu; James Rudd; Ting Hu; Jie Zhang; Guy N Brock; Kevin S Kimbro; Jason H Moore; David W Hein; La Creis R Kidd Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: M I Koukourakis; A Giatromanolaki; M Panteliadou; S E Pouliliou; P S Chondrou; S Mavropoulou; E Sivridis Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: M R Milone; B Pucci; F Bruzzese; C Carbone; G Piro; S Costantini; F Capone; A Leone; E Di Gennaro; M Caraglia; A Budillon Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 8.469