Literature DB >> 22024910

The effect of soft-tissue restraints after type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: a biomechanical study.

C Maxwell J McCabe1, Stewart D McLachlin, Stewart I Bailey, Kevin R Gurr, Christopher S Bailey, Cynthia E Dunning.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A biomechanical analysis of soft-tissue restraints to passive motion in odontoid fractures.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the role of the C1-C2 facet joint capsules and anterior longitudinal ligaments (ALLs) in the setting of a type II odontoid fracture in the elderly. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The odontoid process itself is the primary stabilizer at the C1-C2 level; however, little is known about the role of the soft-tissue structures that remain intact in the setting of an odontoid fracture after a low-energy mechanism.
METHODS: Ten cadaveric C0-C2 spinal segments were studied. Specimens were tested under simulated axial rotation with an applied moment of ±1 Nm and with an application of a 10 N anteriorly directed force to the body of C2 to induce sagittal translation. Optical motion data were initially collected for the intact state and after a simulated dens fracture. The specimens were then divided into 2 groups, where 1 group underwent unilateral and then bilateral C1-C2 facet capsular injuries followed by an ALL injury. The second group underwent the ALL injury before the same capsular injuries. Changes in axial range of motion and C1-C2 translation were analyzed using 2-way repeated measures analyses of variance and post hoc Student-Newman-Keuls tests (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: In axial rotation, there was an increase in range of motion by approximately 13%, with the fracture of the dens compared with the intact state (P < 0.05). An increase was also present for each subsequent soft-tissue injury state compared with the previous (P < 0.05); however, there was no difference found between the 2 sectioning protocols. For sagittal translation testing, it was found that the odontoid fracture alone showed an increase of 3 mm of C1-C2 translation compared with intact (P < 0.05). Further soft-tissue injuries did not show an increase until the complete injury state.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies that type II odontoid fractures without associated soft-tissue injury may be stable under certain loading modes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22024910     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b4ed0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Intubation Biomechanics: Laryngoscope Force and Cervical Spine Motion during Intubation in Cadavers-Cadavers versus Patients, the Effect of Repeated Intubations, and the Effect of Type II Odontoid Fracture on C1-C2 Motion.

Authors:  Bradley J Hindman; Robert P From; Ricardo B Fontes; Vincent C Traynelis; Michael M Todd; M Bridget Zimmerman; Christian M Puttlitz; Brandon G Santoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  C1 anterior arch preservation in transnasal odontoidectomy using three-dimensional endoscope: A case report.

Authors:  Francesco Zenga; Nicola Marengo; Paolo Pacca; Giancarlo Pecorari; Alessandro Ducati
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-12-28

Review 3.  Systematic review on surgical and nonsurgical treatment of type II odontoid fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Yohan Robinson; Anna-Lena Robinson; Claes Olerud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Odontoid process fractures: the role of the ligaments in maintaining stability. A biomechanical, cadaveric study.

Authors:  Oliver Richard Boughton; Jason Bernard; Matthew Szarko
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2015-06-15

5.  Biomechanical Assessment of Stabilization of Simulated Type II Odontoid Fracture with Case Study.

Authors:  Roy T Daniel; Mir M Hussain; Noelle Klocke; Soumya S Yandamuri; Lukas Bobinski; John M Duff; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.