STUDY DESIGN: This study explores the use of bilaminar coculture pellets of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) as a cell-based therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration. The pellets were tested under conditions that mimic the degenerative disc. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to optimize our cell-based therapy in vitro under conditions representative of the eventual diseased tissue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Harnessing the potential of stem cells is an important strategy for regenerative medicine. Our approach directed the behavior of stem cells by mimicking embryonic processes underlying cartilage and intervertebral disc development. Prior experiments have shown that bilaminar coculture can help differentiate MSC and substantially improve new matrix deposition. METHODS: We have designed a novel spherical bilaminar cell pellet (BCP) where MSCs are enclosed in a shell of NPC. There were 3 groups: MSC, NPC, and BCP. The pellets were tested under 3 different culture conditions: 1) in a bioreactor that provides pressure and hypoxia (mimicking normal disc conditions): 2) with inflammatory cytokines (IL-1b and TNF-a); and 3) a bioreactor with inflammation (mimicking painful disc conditions). RESULTS: When cultured in the bioreactor, the NPC pellets produced significantly more glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) per cell than the other groups: 70% to 80% more than the BCP and the MSC alone. When cultured in an inflammatory environment, the MSC and BCP groups produced 30% to 34% more GAGs per cell than NPC (P < 0.05). When the pellets were cultured in a bioreactor with inflammation, the BCP made 25% more GAGs per cell than the MSC and 57% more than the NPC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that BCPs outperform controls in a simulated degenerated disc environment. Adapting inductive mechanisms from development to trigger differentiation and restore diseased tissue has many advantages. As opposed to strategies that require growth factor supplements or genetic manipulations, our method is self-sustaining, targeted, and minimally invasive injection.
STUDY DESIGN: This study explores the use of bilaminar coculture pellets of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) as a cell-based therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration. The pellets were tested under conditions that mimic the degenerative disc. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to optimize our cell-based therapy in vitro under conditions representative of the eventual diseased tissue. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Harnessing the potential of stem cells is an important strategy for regenerative medicine. Our approach directed the behavior of stem cells by mimicking embryonic processes underlying cartilage and intervertebral disc development. Prior experiments have shown that bilaminar coculture can help differentiate MSC and substantially improve new matrix deposition. METHODS: We have designed a novel spherical bilaminar cell pellet (BCP) where MSCs are enclosed in a shell of NPC. There were 3 groups: MSC, NPC, and BCP. The pellets were tested under 3 different culture conditions: 1) in a bioreactor that provides pressure and hypoxia (mimicking normal disc conditions): 2) with inflammatory cytokines (IL-1b and TNF-a); and 3) a bioreactor with inflammation (mimicking painful disc conditions). RESULTS: When cultured in the bioreactor, the NPC pellets produced significantly more glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) per cell than the other groups: 70% to 80% more than the BCP and the MSC alone. When cultured in an inflammatory environment, the MSC and BCP groups produced 30% to 34% more GAGs per cell than NPC (P < 0.05). When the pellets were cultured in a bioreactor with inflammation, the BCP made 25% more GAGs per cell than the MSC and 57% more than the NPC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows that BCPs outperform controls in a simulated degenerated disc environment. Adapting inductive mechanisms from development to trigger differentiation and restore diseased tissue has many advantages. As opposed to strategies that require growth factor supplements or genetic manipulations, our method is self-sustaining, targeted, and minimally invasive injection.
Authors: Aliza A Allon; Nicolas Aurouer; Bryan B Yoo; Ellen C Liebenberg; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Lotz Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Catherine Le Visage; Seok Woo Kim; Kei Tateno; Ann N Sieber; John P Kostuik; Kam W Leong Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: J U Yoo; T S Barthel; K Nishimura; L Solchaga; A I Caplan; V M Goldberg; B Johnstone Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Kathryn T Weber; Timothy D Jacobsen; Robert Maidhof; Justin Virojanapa; Chris Overby; Ona Bloom; Shaheda Quraishi; Mitchell Levine; Nadeen O Chahine Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2015-03
Authors: Yu Moriguchi; Marjan Alimi; Thamina Khair; George Manolarakis; Connor Berlin; Lawrence J Bonassar; Roger Härtl Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2016-01-27