Literature DB >> 22024895

Minimally invasive cervical spine foraminotomy and lateral mass screw placement.

Mark M Mikhael1, Paul C Celestre, Christopher F Wolf, Tom E Mroz, Jeffrey C Wang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This technique article describes accomplishing multilevel posterior cervical decompression and lateral mass screw placement through a tubular retraction system.
OBJECTIVE: Multilevel foraminotomy and instrumented fusion using lateral mass screw fixation can be achieved through a minimally invasive technique using specialized retractors and intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been adapted to the cervical spine with good results. These techniques have the theoretical advantages of reducing morbidity, blood loss, perioperative pain, and length of hospital stay associated with conventional open posterior spinal exposure.
METHODS: Minimally invasive access to the posterior cervical spine was performed with exposure through a paramedian muscle-splitting approach. With the assistance of a specialized tubular retraction system with a deep soft tissue expansion mechanism, multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion can be accomplished.
RESULTS: Minimized access to perform multilevel posterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion can be safely accomplished with tubular retraction systems. Complications associated with these techniques can include inadequate decompression, improper instrumentation placement, or neurologic injury due to poor access and visualization.
CONCLUSION: Multilevel foraminotomy and instrumented fusion using lateral mass screw fixation can be safely achieved using these techniques. Complications associated with these strategies are typically due to inadequate visualization, incomplete decompression, or poor placement of instrumentation. As with all minimally invasive spine techniques, the surgeon must ensure that goals of the surgery, both technical and clinical outcomes, are comparable to those of a conventional open procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22024895     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823a43f9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.

Authors:  Péter Banczerowski; Gábor Czigléczki; Zoltán Papp; Róbert Veres; Harry Zvi Rappaport; János Vajda
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Novel Foraminal Expansion Technique.

Authors:  Ali Fahir Ozer; Salim Senturk; Mert Ciplak; Tunc Oktenoglu; Mehdi Sasani; Emrah Egemen; Onur Yaman; Tuncer Suzer
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-08-16

3.  Open laminoforaminotomy: A lost art?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-11-25

4.  Lateral mass screw fixation in cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Lal Rehman; Iram Bukhari; Ali Afzal; Raza Rizvi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Treatment of cervical spine metastasis with minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Li-Ming He; Xun Ma; Chen Chen; Hong-Yi Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Four lateral mass screw fixation techniques in lower cervical spine following laminectomy: a finite element analysis study of stress distribution.

Authors:  Mingzhi Song; Zhen Zhang; Ming Lu; Junwei Zong; Chao Dong; Kai Ma; Shouyu Wang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.