Literature DB >> 22024258

Effectiveness of abdominal cerclage placed via laparotomy or laparoscopy: systematic review.

N B Burger1, H A M Brölmann, J I Einarsson, A Langebrekke, J A F Huirne.   

Abstract

Preterm delivery remains a primary cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. One cause of preterm birth is cervical incompetence. In women with a shortened or absent cervix or in those in whom previous vaginal cerclage failed, abdominal cerclage may be recommended. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. Thirty-one eligible studies were selected. Six studies (135 patients) reported on the laparoscopic approach, and 26 (1116 patients) on the abdominal approach. Delivery of a viable infant at 34 weeks of gestation or more varied from 78.5% (laparoscopic) to 84.8% (abdominal). Second-trimester fetal loss occurred in 8.1% (laparoscopic) vs 7.8% (abdominal), with no reported third-trimester losses (laparoscopic) vs 1.2% (abdominal). We conclude that abdominal cerclage is associated with excellent results as treatment of cervical incompetence, with high fetal survival rates and minimal complications during surgery and pregnancy. Further studies are needed to differentiate which method is superior.
Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22024258     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  12 in total

1.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

2.  Overcoming the obstacles of visualization in robotically assisted abdominal cerclage using indocyanine green.

Authors:  Burak Zeybek; Mostafa Borahay; Gokhan Sami Kilic
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-04-19

3.  Minimally invasive abdominal cerclage compared to laparotomy: a comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Soorin Kim; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Sarah Cross; Masoud Azodi; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-18

4.  Therapeutic effect and safety of laparoscopic cervical cerclage for treatment of cervical insufficiency in first trimester or non-pregnant phase.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Huashan Liu; Jiayu Gu; Shuzhong Yao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

5.  Laparoscopic Cerclage as a Treatment Option for Cervical Insufficiency.

Authors:  D Bolla; L Raio; S Imboden; M D Mueller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  The interval robotic transabdominal cerclage in a morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Mete Güngör; Selim Afşar; Esra Özbaşlı; Canan Erdem Genim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-14

7.  Successful delivery after vaginal occlusion in addition to cerclage in a trachelectomy patient with recurrent second trimester pregnancy loss: a case report.

Authors:  Kirstine Sneider; Mette Østergaard Poulsen; Christian Ottosen; Jens Langhoff-Roos
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2014-06-03

8.  Robot-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Burak Zeybek; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Mostafa A Borahay; Masoud Azodi; Gokhan Sami Kilic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic fertility sparing management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Facchini; Giuseppina Rapacchia; Giulia Montanari; Paolo Casadio; Gianluigi Pilu; Renato Seracchioli
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-09

10.  Successful Pregnancy Outcome after Laparoscopic Cerclage in a Patient with Cervicovaginal Fistula.

Authors:  Giovanni Zanconato; Valentino Bergamini; Silvia Baggio; Elena Cavaliere; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.