BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little information is available about the long-term prognosis after hepatectomy for liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). To clarify the prognosis for liver metastases of NETs after hepatectomy and to identify a practical and useful surgical indication for hepatic metastases of NETs. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four patients with NET were divided into 2 groups: the nHM group (patients without hepatic metastasis, n=13) and the HM group (patients with hepatic metastasis or recurrences, n=11). Hepatectomy was indicated for metastases or disease recurrences in the liver if R0 resection was expected to be achievable. Patient clinicopathological features, mode of recurrences and treatment for them were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the 24 patients was 34 months (range 7-69) and the disease specific survival rate was 82% at 5 years. DSS at 5 years did not differ between patients with and without hepatic recurrence (91% vs. 75% respectively, p=0.6144), even though the histological grade and the MIB-1 index were higher in the HM group. CONCLUSIONS: Patient prognosis was acceptable following our policy of hepatectomy for NET liver metastases. Survival could be improved by intensive multimodal treatment.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little information is available about the long-term prognosis after hepatectomy for liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). To clarify the prognosis for liver metastases of NETs after hepatectomy and to identify a practical and useful surgical indication for hepatic metastases of NETs. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-four patients with NET were divided into 2 groups: the nHM group (patients without hepatic metastasis, n=13) and the HM group (patients with hepatic metastasis or recurrences, n=11). Hepatectomy was indicated for metastases or disease recurrences in the liver if R0 resection was expected to be achievable. Patient clinicopathological features, mode of recurrences and treatment for them were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the 24 patients was 34 months (range 7-69) and the disease specific survival rate was 82% at 5 years. DSS at 5 years did not differ between patients with and without hepatic recurrence (91% vs. 75% respectively, p=0.6144), even though the histological grade and the MIB-1 index were higher in the HM group. CONCLUSIONS:Patient prognosis was acceptable following our policy of hepatectomy for NET liver metastases. Survival could be improved by intensive multimodal treatment.