Literature DB >> 2202420

Childhood cancer after prenatal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examinations in Britain.

R H Mole1.   

Abstract

Detailed data were provided by the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancer OSCC on deaths from childhood cancer in Britain after irradiation of the fetus during diagnostic radiology of the mother. In each age group at death, 0-5, 6-9 and 10-15 years, excess cancer deaths decreased suddenly for births in and after 1958. A major factor was concerted action initiated in 1956 to reduce radiation exposure of fetal gonads for fear of genetic hazards. Dose reduction was achieved during 1957 and early 1958 by reducing the rising rate of obstetric radiography and by virtually abandoning pelvimetry as that had been understood. In the 1970s the rate of X-raying increased again and so did cancer risk but not significantly. Direct evidence that diagnostic X-rays can cause childhood cancer is the similar excess rate per X-ray in twins and singleton births when X-raying rate is 5-6 times higher in twins. In the past a dose-response for cancer in OSCC data based on number of films per X-ray examination was taken to be evidence for causation but dose per film varies with kind of X-ray examination. Fixed values for dose per film were mistakenly assumed by UNSCEAR (1972) and used by it and others when deriving risk co-efficients. In updated OSCC data cancer risk is independent of film number. The odds ratio for childhood cancer deaths after X-raying in birth years 1958-61 (1.23 with 95% confidence intervals CI 1.04-1.48) and the mean fetal whole body dose from obstetric radiography in 1958 (0.6 cGy) can each be derived from nationwide surveys in Britain. The corresponding risk coefficient for irradiation in the third trimester for childhood cancer deaths at ages 0-15 years = 4-5 x 10(-4) per cGy fetal whole body dose (95% CI 0.8-9.5 x 10(-4) per cGy). It is the same for cancer incidence and mortality. A lower risk in bomb survivors exposed in utero is not incompatible since its CI are wide. There is no dependable evidence that radiosensitivity is greater in early pregnancy. A significantly raised cancer rate after diagnostic X-raying supports the hypothesis that carcinogenesis by ionising radiation has no threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2202420      PMCID: PMC1971756          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1990.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  29 in total

1.  Variations in the radiation dose received by the patient in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  S B OSBORN
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation doses to the foetal and maternal gonads in obstetric radiography during late pregnancy.

Authors:  C G CLAYTON; F T FARMER; C K WARRICK
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Maternal and foetal radiation dosage during obstetric radiographic examinations.

Authors:  D K BEWLEY; J W LAWS; C J MYDDLETON
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1957-06       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The genetically significant radiation dose from the diagnostic use of x-rays in England and Wales; a preliminary survey.

Authors:  S B OSBORN; E E SMITH
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1956-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Radiation dose effects in relation to obstetric x-rays and childhood cancers.

Authors:  A Stewart; G W Kneale
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-06-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Childhood cancer following obstetric radiography.

Authors:  A Stewart; G W Kneale
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Radiation hazards from diagnostic radiology. A repeat survey over a small area.

Authors:  J C Matthews; H Miller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Tumour immunology and evolution of the placenta.

Authors:  J G Sinkovics; P J DiSaia; F N Rutledge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Low dose radiation cancers in man.

Authors:  A Stewart
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 6.242

10.  Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers: progress report. IV. Reliability of data reported by case and control mothers.

Authors:  D Hewitt; B Sanders; A Stewart
Journal:  Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv       Date:  1966-02
View more
  28 in total

1.  Childhood leukaemia in areas with different radon levels: a spatial and temporal analysis using GIS.

Authors:  S Kohli; H Noorlind Brage; O Löfman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Possible aetiological factors in childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  E Roman; V Beral
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Health of children born to medical radiographers.

Authors:  E Roman; P Doyle; P Ansell; D Bull; V Beral
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Management of urological cancers during pregnancy.

Authors:  Makarand V Khochikar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Prenatal X-ray exposure and rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Seymour Grufferman; Frederick Ruymann; Simona Ognjanovic; Erik B Erhardt; Harold M Maurer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Children's exposure to diagnostic medical radiation and cancer risk: epidemiologic and dosimetric considerations.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Kwang Pyo Kim; Preetha Rajaraman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16

8.  Very high birth weight of offspring is associated with an increased risk of leukemia in their mothers: results of a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ora Paltiel; Rebecca Yanetz; Ronit Calderon-Margalit; Orly Manor; Nir Sharon; Susan Harlap; Yehiel Friedlander
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Childhood cancer among Swedish twins.

Authors:  Y Rodvall; Z Hrubec; G Pershagen; A Ahlbom; A Bjurman; J D Boice
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.